2015
DOI: 10.1002/2014wr016310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and simulation of subsurface tracer migration to tile drains in low permeability, macroporous soil

Abstract: Multiyear monitoring and simulation of a conservative tracer was used in this study to investigate preferential flow and macropore-matrix interactions in low permeability, macroporous soil. 2,6-Difluorobenzoic acid (DFBA) tracer was applied to a 20 3 20 m drip irrigated test plot situated over two tile drains. Tracer movement over the 2009 and 2010 field seasons was monitored using tile drain effluent, suction lysimeters, monitoring wells, and soil cores. Despite similar volumes of water application to the plo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(102 reference statements)
1
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent decades, a number of studies (Arora et al, ; Beven & Germann, ; Bishop et al, ; Cuthbert et al, ; Ford et al, ; Kohne et al, ; Nimmo, ; Simunek & van Genuchten, ) have demonstrated that water flow and nutrient transport in the unsaturated zone is greatly influenced by preferential flow paths. Consistent with these previous findings, the inclusion of macropore flow into Dhara significantly increases its ability to predict subsurface nitrogen losses.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, a number of studies (Arora et al, ; Beven & Germann, ; Bishop et al, ; Cuthbert et al, ; Ford et al, ; Kohne et al, ; Nimmo, ; Simunek & van Genuchten, ) have demonstrated that water flow and nutrient transport in the unsaturated zone is greatly influenced by preferential flow paths. Consistent with these previous findings, the inclusion of macropore flow into Dhara significantly increases its ability to predict subsurface nitrogen losses.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, DP models are now sometimes used as management and decision‐making tools, for example in pesticide risk assessment (Jarvis et al, 2012; Jarvis and Larsbo, 2012). Two‐ and three‐dimensional versions of DP models have also been developed that have been used to explore the impacts of pore‐scale processes on soil hydrology and water quality in both drained and undrained soils at hillslope and field scales (e.g., GĂ€rdenĂ€s et al, 2006; Warsta et al, 2013; Gerke et al, 2013; Bishop et al, 2015; Dusek and Vogel, 2016). One disadvantage of DP models is that the properties of the macropore system are only implicitly reflected in model parameters that cannot easily be directly measured.…”
Section: Model Concepts and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coenders-Gerrits et al (2013) used the same model structure to examine the role of interception and slope in the subsurface runoff generation. Bishop et al (2015), Wienhöfer and Zehe (2014) and Klaus and Zehe (2011) used physically based models to investigate the influence of vertical and lateral preferential flow networks on subsurface water flow and solute transport, including the issue of equifinality and its reduction. These and other studies (e.g., Ebel et al, 2008;Scudeler et al, 2016) show that physically based models can be set up using a mix of expert knowledge and observed parameters and may be tested against a variety of observations beyond streamflow -such as soil moisture observations, groundwater tables or tracer breakthrough curves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%