2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.02.25.965764
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement error and resolution in quantitative stable isotope probing: implications for experimental design

Abstract: 24Quantitative stable isotope probing (qSIP) estimates the degree of incorporation of an isotope 25 tracer into nucleic acids of metabolically active organisms and can be applied to microorganisms 26 growing in complex communities, such as the microbiomes of soil or water. As such, qSIP has 27 the potential to link microbial biodiversity and biogeochemistry. As with any technique 28 involving quantitative estimation, qSIP involves measurement error; a more complete 29 understanding of error, precision and s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The uncertainties of these estimated rates mirror the uncertainties in measuring the abundance of metagenome-assembled genomes in soil. The use of larger numbers of density fractions results in much reduced uncertainties in growth rate estimates (61). However, as expected, both phage and bacteria showed higher average growth rates than the slower-growing eukaryotes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The uncertainties of these estimated rates mirror the uncertainties in measuring the abundance of metagenome-assembled genomes in soil. The use of larger numbers of density fractions results in much reduced uncertainties in growth rate estimates (61). However, as expected, both phage and bacteria showed higher average growth rates than the slower-growing eukaryotes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Samples were subjected to a cesium chloride density gradient formed by physical density separation via ultracentrifugation as previously described with minor modifications 31,32 . For each sample, 5 μg of DNA in 150 μL 1xTE was mixed with 1.00 mL gradient buffer, and 4.60 mL CsCl stock (1.885 g mL -1 ) with a final average density of 1.730 g mL -1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We quantified excess atom fraction (EAF) 18 O of bacterial DNA following a modified version of the procedure described by Hungate et al using average DNA concentration to normalize the relative abundance of taxa within each density fraction 32,43,44 . We calculated median values and 95% confidence intervals for EAF 18 O by bootstrapping (n=1000) across experimental replicates.…”
Section: Quantitative Stable Isotope Probing Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heavy-water (H 2 18 O) SIP-metagenomics has recently gained a lot of attention because water is a universal substrate and incorporation of 18 O into newly synthesized DNA allows taxon-specific microbial growth and mortality rates to be calculated (95). Downsides to this method include the expensive cost of isotopically labeled substrate, the amount needed to ensure nucleic acid is sufficiently labeled, a high amount of nucleic acid required for input, and the cost and effort associated with sequencing multiple fractions as well as an unlabeled control sample to provide enough resolution for ecological inference (96).…”
Section: Metagenomic Approaches To Viral Dynamics and Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%