2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.102.054302
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement-induced quantum criticality under continuous monitoring

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
56
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…27,28,29]. Also in this case entanglement phase transitions have been identified [22,30]. A crucial feature of these transitions is that they are invisible to the average dynamics but only appears at the level of single quantum many-body states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…27,28,29]. Also in this case entanglement phase transitions have been identified [22,30]. A crucial feature of these transitions is that they are invisible to the average dynamics but only appears at the level of single quantum many-body states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…These measurement-induced transitions occur in a wide variety of models, including random circuits , Hamiltonian systems [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], and measurement-only models [28,45,46,57], and they exhibit universal behavior. However, the determination of the relevant universality classes has proved to be a subtle issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, if the unitary evolution is implemented by a time-independent Hamiltonian, the origin of the phase transition in terms of non-commuting operators becomes directly apparent [35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. Repeatedly measuring a set of local operators {O l } then projects the system towards a shared eigenstate of all the operators O l .…”
Section: Perspectives On Measurement-induced Dynamics: a Recapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hamiltonian, however, for [H, O l ] = 0 is not compatible with the measurements, and constantly pushes the system out of the eigenstate manifold. The wave function then displays a volume law (logarithmically growing) entanglement entropy if the evolution is dominated by a generic (integrable) Hamiltonian, and an area law if instead the measurement-induced collapse into eigenstates dominates [35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. While this competition between non-commuting operators is reminiscent of a quantum phase transition in the ground state of a Hamiltonian, it also reveals a crucial difference; when measuring L different operators O l , and each operator has a number of n O different eigenstates, then, due to the probabilistic nature of the measurement process, the steady state will experience a macroscopic degeneracy of O(n L O ) compatible wave functions.…”
Section: Perspectives On Measurement-induced Dynamics: a Recapmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation