Measurement Invariance and Latent Mean Differences in the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS): Does the German Version of the RIAS Allow a Valid Assessment of Individuals with a Migration Background?

Abstract

This study examined measurement invariance and latent mean differences in the German version of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS) for 316 individuals with a migration background (defined as speaking German as a second language) and 316 sex- and age-matched natives. The RIAS measures general intelligence (single-factor structure) and its two components, verbal and nonverbal intelligence (two-factor structure). Results of a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis showed scalar invariance for the two-factor and partial scalar invariance for the single-factor structure. We conclude that the two-factor structure of the RIAS is comparable across groups. Hence, verbal and nonverbal intelligence but not general intelligence should be considered when comparing RIAS test results of individuals with and without a migration background. Further, latent mean differences especially on the verbal, but also on the nonverbal intelligence index indicate language barriers for individuals with a migration background, as subtests corresponding to verbal intelligence require higher skills in German language. Moreover, cultural, environmental, and social factors that have to be taken into account when assessing individuals with a migration background are discussed.

Exploring the Accuracy and Consistency of a School Readiness Assessment Tool for Preschoolers: Reliability, Validity and Measurement Invariance Analysis

“…(Diotaiuti et al 2022). By establishing measurement invariance, researchers gain confidence in comparing and interpreting analytical outcomes, such as latent means, across distant groups and different timeframes (Gygi et al 2016).…”

Diagnostic Assessment of School Readiness

“…Therefore, it is wise to take care with regard to the value of MI testing in psychological research. The Multi-group Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MG-CFA) is an extension on the strength of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), providing a more comprehensive test of MI by examining multiple aspects of the construct, such as configural, metric, scalar, and residual variances (Gygi et al, 2016;Zewude & Hercz, 2022).…”

“…However, for such studies to yield meaningful and comparable results, it is imperative that the measurement instruments used possess measurement invariance (Diotaiuti et al, 2022). By establishing measurement invariance, researchers gain confidence in comparing and interpreting analytical outcomes, such as latent means, across distant groups and different timeframes (Gygi et al, 2016).…”

The Impact of Gamification and Individual Differences on Second Language Learning Among First-Year Female University Students in Saudi Arabia

“…In the same model, the effects of experience and attitude toward video games on student performance mediated by student motivation were also assessed. The goodness of model fit was assessed using root mean square error approximation (RMSEA), standardized root mean square residual (SRMR), the comparative fit index (CFI) and the Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), (Gygi et al, 2016). All tests were two-sided, performed using a significance level of 95% (α = 0.05).…”