2023
DOI: 10.1037/men0000429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement invariance and psychometric properties of a German-language Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory among cisgender sexual minority and heterosexually identified women and men.

Abstract: The present study translated the 30-item Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory (CMNI-30) from English to German. Indices for measurement invariance across gender and sexual orientation, test-retest reliabilities, and indicators of convergent (positive correlations with the Male Role Norms Inventory-Short Form and the Gender Role Conflict Scale-Short Form) and discriminant (no correlations with the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale) validity were estimated. Working from a sample of 1,012 German-speakin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ten subscales represent the following masculine norms: Emotional Control, Winning, Playboy, Violence, Heterosexual self-presentation, Pursuit of status, Primacy of Work, Power over Women, Self-Reliance, Risk-Taking. The German-language version used in the current study showed adequate evidence for convergent validity and test-retest reliability, as well as invariance across sexual orientation, i.e., assessing the same construct among men who identify as heterosexual or as sexual minorities (Komlenac et al, 2023). In the present sample, the CMNI-30 total score possessed an internal consistency of Cronbach's α = .81 and McDonald's ω = .84; with its subscales ranging from α = .65 and ω = .66 for the Violence subscale to α = ω = .93 for the Heterosexual self-presentation subscale.…”
Section: Conformity To Masculine Norms Inventory -30mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The ten subscales represent the following masculine norms: Emotional Control, Winning, Playboy, Violence, Heterosexual self-presentation, Pursuit of status, Primacy of Work, Power over Women, Self-Reliance, Risk-Taking. The German-language version used in the current study showed adequate evidence for convergent validity and test-retest reliability, as well as invariance across sexual orientation, i.e., assessing the same construct among men who identify as heterosexual or as sexual minorities (Komlenac et al, 2023). In the present sample, the CMNI-30 total score possessed an internal consistency of Cronbach's α = .81 and McDonald's ω = .84; with its subscales ranging from α = .65 and ω = .66 for the Violence subscale to α = ω = .93 for the Heterosexual self-presentation subscale.…”
Section: Conformity To Masculine Norms Inventory -30mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, this lack of reliability must be considered when drawing conclusions involving the MC-SDS. Furthermore, a recent validation study of the German version of the CMNI-30 ( Komlenac et al, 2023 ) found that a bifactor model is only valid in heterosexual-identified men, but not sexual minority men. Hence, for about 30% of sexual minority men in the present sample, the use of a total score would not be indicated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the original English version internal consistencies ranging from α = 0.72 to α = 0.94 have been reported ( Levant et al, 2020 ). The German translation was reported to have internal consistencies of ω = 0.63 to ω = 0.94 and to be invariant across sexual orientation, i.e., measuring the same constructs with the same accuracy in heterosexually identified and sexual minority men ( Komlenac et al, 2023 ). Furthermore, for heterosexually identified cisgender men the validation of the German version of the CMNI-30 supported the use of a total score for TMI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies on TM have been based on research involving men living in English-speaking countries. Nevertheless, research within and outside English-speaking countries demonstrated gender, sexuality, age, ethnic, and national differences (e.g., Komlenac & Hochleitner, 2022;Komlenac et al, 2023;Krivoshchekov et al, 2021Krivoshchekov et al, , 2022; R. F. Levant, 2011; R. Levant & Richmond, 2007).…”
Section: Traditional Masculinitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars consider that various elements of TM form a single construct (i.e., traditional masculinity ideology and GRC; Komlenac & Hochleitner, 2022;Krivoshchekov et al, 2021;McDermott et al, 2017;O'Neil, 2015); therefore, it can be assumed that different domains are similarly associated with sexism. Others believe that the different elements of TM are relatively independent of each other and do not form a single construct (conformity to masculine norms; Komlenac et al, 2023;Krivoshchekov et al, 2022;; therefore, one would expect that different domains are differently associated with sexism. In the second case, the question arises as to which TM domains are more strongly associated with sexism.…”
Section: Relationship Between Tm and Sexismmentioning
confidence: 99%