2016
DOI: 10.1108/jea-01-2015-0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement invariance of second-order factor model of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) across K-12 principal gender

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the factor structure and the measurement invariance of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) across gender of K-12 school principals (n=6,317) in the USA. Design/methodology/approach Nine first-order factor models and four second-order factor models were tested using confirmatory factor analysis. Findings The results suggested that the nine-factor model provided the best fit for the data. Further examination revealed that most constructs lacked c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, to examine whether item grouping was justified by the data, 5 (for FI) or 6 (for SFI)-factor models were tested (M1) with (1) one latent factor corresponding to each domain, (2) each item loaded only by a latent factor corresponding to the domain of an item and not by other latent factors, (3) correlated latent factors and (4) uncorrelated error terms. Secondly, a second-order factor model (M2) with (1) one latent factor corresponding to each domain, (2) each item loaded only by a latent factor corresponding to the domain of an item and not by other latent factors and (3) domain specific factors loaded by the second-order factor corresponding to human flourishing or secure human flourishing, for FI and SFI respectively (Xu et al, 2016). Schematics of these two specifications tested are shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, to examine whether item grouping was justified by the data, 5 (for FI) or 6 (for SFI)-factor models were tested (M1) with (1) one latent factor corresponding to each domain, (2) each item loaded only by a latent factor corresponding to the domain of an item and not by other latent factors, (3) correlated latent factors and (4) uncorrelated error terms. Secondly, a second-order factor model (M2) with (1) one latent factor corresponding to each domain, (2) each item loaded only by a latent factor corresponding to the domain of an item and not by other latent factors and (3) domain specific factors loaded by the second-order factor corresponding to human flourishing or secure human flourishing, for FI and SFI respectively (Xu et al, 2016). Schematics of these two specifications tested are shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we consider four emotional aspects that are often connected to servant leadership. positive difference in others' lives by putting others' professional development ahead of one's own self-interest or cost (Cerit, 2009;Xu et al, 2015). Empathy refers to an awareness of others' feelings, needs, and concerns (Aas and Vavik, 2015).…”
Section: Prosocial Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature of the past studies, there is little information on leadership effectiveness in the field of health and treatment ( 11 ). According to Bass et al in 2009, weakness in selection and employment has resulted in lack of effective leaders in health and treatment organizations, especially hospitals ( 12 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%