2022
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2118867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement invariance of the 12-item self-administered World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 across early and late adolescents in Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…32 The WHODAS 2.0 has been shown to be valid and reliable in populations of adolescents with or without chronic illness. 33 - 38 In this sample of adolescents, internal consistency of the WHODAS 2.0 was good (α = .83).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…32 The WHODAS 2.0 has been shown to be valid and reliable in populations of adolescents with or without chronic illness. 33 - 38 In this sample of adolescents, internal consistency of the WHODAS 2.0 was good (α = .83).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Response options 4 ( severe ) and 5 (ex treme/cannot do ) were collapsed for each item due to sparse data. The WHODAS 2.0 has demonstrated robust psychometric properties in clinical and epidemiological samples of children with and without chronic illnesses (Ferro, Basque, Elgie, & Dol, 2023; Ferro, Dol, Basque, & Elgie, 2023; Ferro, Elgie, Dol, & Basque, 2023; Tompke et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%