2008
DOI: 10.1177/154193120805201946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement Invariance of the Nasa TLX

Abstract: Mental workload is one of the most important constructs of interests for Human Factors researchers. Adequately assessing the amount of mental workload that people experience while performing tasks under specific conditions is essential for the design of safe and efficient systems. Due to its ease of use, the NASA TLX has become the most widely used method of measuring mental workload. However, its psychometric properties are still questionable. The purpose of this study was to examine the extent of measurement… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NASA‐TLX is a subjective mental load self‐assessment questionnaire. Following the measurement invariance of the different scales of the original test (Bustamante & Spain, ), we used a single dimension of the NASA‐TLX rating procedure that derives the mental load score based on the rating on a 7‐point score.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NASA‐TLX is a subjective mental load self‐assessment questionnaire. Following the measurement invariance of the different scales of the original test (Bustamante & Spain, ), we used a single dimension of the NASA‐TLX rating procedure that derives the mental load score based on the rating on a 7‐point score.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items were scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing stronger endorsements of the item. Ratings from NASA-TLX were combined to an overall task load score (Bustamante & Spain, 2008).…”
Section: Rating Scales Measuring Subjective Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For data analysis, we processed the raw TLX data. This may be a more reliable use of the TLX compared with using part two to calculate an overall weight-adjusted score [5].…”
Section: Qualitative Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%