Measurement Invariance of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index: Evidence from 15 European Countries

Abstract

(1) Background: The World Health Organization (WHO)-5 Well-Being Index has been used in many epidemiological studies to assess adolescent mental well-being. However, cross-country comparisons of this instrument among adolescents are scarce and, so far, no good-fitting, common invariant measurement model across countries has been reported. The present study aims to evaluate and establish a version of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index that allows for a valid cross-country comparison of adolescent self-reported mental well-being. (2) Methods: Using data from the 2018 Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study, we evaluated the measurement model and measurement invariance of the five items of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index. We used nationally representative samples of 11-, 13-, and 15-year-old adolescents (N = 74,071) from fifteen countries and regions in Europe. Measurement invariance of the WHO-5 was assessed using a series (country, gender, and age) of multi-group confirmatory factor analyses. In addition, we evaluated the convergent validity of the measure by testing its correlations with psychosomatic complaints, life satisfaction, and self-rated health. (3) Results: We found that WHO-5 does not show good psychometric properties or good measurement invariance fit. However, by excluding the first item of the scale (“I have felt cheerful and in good spirits”), the WHO-4, consisting of the other four original items, had good psychometric properties, and demonstrated good suitability for cross-national comparisons (as well as age and gender) in adolescent mental well-being. (4) Conclusions: The present study introduces the WHO-4—a revised version of the WHO-5—, that allows for a valid comparison of mental well-being across fifteen countries and regions in Europe. The WHO-4 proved to be a reliable and valid instrument to assess mental well-being in the adolescent population.

Associations of lifestyle with mental health and well-being in Chinese adults: a nationwide study

“…The depression and anxiety scale scores in our study were slightly lower than the scores reported in previous nationwide populationbased studies conducted in Turkey, Germany, and Poland (44)(45)(46). Regarding subjective well-being, the scores of our study were higher than those obtained in previous studies conducted in 15 European countries (47). The observed differences may be attributed to cultural variations, including the importance placed on interpersonal harmony and emotional restraint in China (48,49).…”

Mental Health among Adolescents Attending Different School Types - First Result from a Longitudinal Study

“…Láng also used the same questionnaire to assess the general well-being of adolescents, and obtained similar results (9.11) (Láng, 2019). Cosma et al (2022) used data from the HBSC survey to analyse the overall wellbeing of 16 countries. Although Hungary did not provide data in this case, students in the participating countries scored the highest averages on the option "I have felt cheerful and in good mood in the last two weeks".…”

Exploring the associations between resilience and psychological well-being among South Africans during COVID-19

“…The WHO-5 is a self-report questionnaire designed to assess subjective well-being that was developed as a unidimensional scale ( Cosma et al, 2022 ). Respondents were asked to rate the applicability of each of the five statements to their experience during the COVID-19 pandemic ( Staehr, 1998 ).…”

“…The WHO Well-being Index has been widely utilized in various countries ( Carranza Esteban et al, 2022 ; Cosma et al, 2022 ; Kassab Alshayea, 2023 ) and contexts ( Chan et al, 2022 ; Lara-Cabrera et al, 2022 ) to assess well-being and monitor changes over time. For the WHO-5, Cronbach’s alpha is between 0.8 and 0.9 in multiple studies ( Lara-Cabrera et al, 2022 ; Low et al, 2023 ), suggesting high internal consistency.…”