2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12043-012-0299-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of 232Th(n, γ) and 232Th( ${n}, {2n}$ ) cross-sections at neutron energies of 13.5, 15.5 and 17.28 MeV using neutron activation techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen from Table 2, our measured results are in good agreement with the literature data [19] but much lower than [20]. For purpose of comparison, the 232 Th(n,γ) 231 Th reaction cross sections from the present work and the similar experimental data from the literatures [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] were plotted in Fig. 1 together with the evaluated data [4][5][6] as well as the theoretical values from computer code TALYS1.6…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It can be seen from Table 2, our measured results are in good agreement with the literature data [19] but much lower than [20]. For purpose of comparison, the 232 Th(n,γ) 231 Th reaction cross sections from the present work and the similar experimental data from the literatures [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] were plotted in Fig. 1 together with the evaluated data [4][5][6] as well as the theoretical values from computer code TALYS1.6…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The cross sections of the 232 Th(n,γ) 233 Th reaction measured in the present work and the values around neutron energy 14 MeV given in the literature are summarized in Table 2 together with the cross section of the monitor reaction 27 Al(n,α) 24 Na. In the calculations, the cross sections for the 27 Al(n,α) 24 Na monitor reaction were obtained by interpolating the evaluated values from the literature [12].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations