2016 Loughborough Antennas &Amp; Propagation Conference (LAPC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/lapc.2016.7807533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of absorption cross section of a lossy object in reverberation chamber without the need for calibration

Abstract: Abstract-A reliable and simple procedure is proposed to measure the averaged absorption cross section (ACS) of a lossy object in a reverberation chamber (RC). This procedure is based on the time-domain measurement of the ACS in an RC. In the time-domain, to obtain the ACS, the chamber decay time needs to be known. Conventionally, the ACS is normally measured in the frequency domain, and a full two-port calibration must be carried out before collecting the S-parameters, which is tedious and time-consuming. In r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The loading of the RC due to secondplaced antenna and stronger low-frequency coupling between the two placed antennas in RC for two-port S-parameter measurements are the reasons of getting relatively lower f wso using S 21 data. The findings of [50], [51] and as illustrated in Table 5 confirms that when the estimation of the wellstirred condition of the RC is required with the essential placement of the two antennas in RC as needed in [2], [7]- [10], [52], the use of the current gain transfer function of the RC environment is more appropriate. The estimated f wso using T I (jω) and |E| 24 is almost same.…”
Section: A Statistical Tests For Rc Field Analysismentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The loading of the RC due to secondplaced antenna and stronger low-frequency coupling between the two placed antennas in RC for two-port S-parameter measurements are the reasons of getting relatively lower f wso using S 21 data. The findings of [50], [51] and as illustrated in Table 5 confirms that when the estimation of the wellstirred condition of the RC is required with the essential placement of the two antennas in RC as needed in [2], [7]- [10], [52], the use of the current gain transfer function of the RC environment is more appropriate. The estimated f wso using T I (jω) and |E| 24 is almost same.…”
Section: A Statistical Tests For Rc Field Analysismentioning
confidence: 68%
“…S-parameters are recorded by placing a single [17] (see Fig. 1 in [17]) or two antennas in an RC [2], [8], [9], [52], [61]- [64] as illustrated in Fig. 11.…”
Section: ) Frequency Domain Qmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ACS of an object in an RC can be determined from the difference in σ tot for the chamber with and without the object. From (6) the ACS of a lossy object can be written as follows [1], [11]:…”
Section: Acs Measurement In An Rcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PDP is extracted from the inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) of the S 21 measured in the frequency domain, by a vector network analyzer (VNA). This method can give accurate ACS results even without the calibration of VNA [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%