2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10546-004-8946-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of air temperature in the presence of a large radiant flux: an assessment of assively ventilated thermometer screens

Abstract: The energy balance of small temperature sensors was modelled to illustrate the effects of sensor characteristics, particularly size, on the accuracy of readings in the presence of strong shortwave or longwave radiant loads. For all but extremely small sensors, radiant exchange may lead to unacceptable errors. The common practice of using passively ventilated instrument screens was evaluated in a series of comparative measurements. The differences resulting from the use of different models of shields may be an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…NTC thermistors (MEA model 6507, nominal accuracy 0.2°C) were housed in radiation shields constructed especially for the experiment (Erell and Williamson, 2006). Comparative tests of this type of makeshift instrument shield in conditions of very bright sunlight and low wind against a mechanically aspirated standard, confirmed that it was superior to the conventional Stevenson screen (Erell et al, 2005), which has been shown to produce some error in such conditions (World-Meteorological-Organization, 1971;Sparks, 1972;Andersson and Mathisson, 1992;van der Meulen, 1998). However, error due to radiant load cannot be ruled out entirely when relatively large sensors are used, such as the thermistors employed in this experiment, and deviations of up to 1°C from 'true' air temperature are nonetheless possible.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NTC thermistors (MEA model 6507, nominal accuracy 0.2°C) were housed in radiation shields constructed especially for the experiment (Erell and Williamson, 2006). Comparative tests of this type of makeshift instrument shield in conditions of very bright sunlight and low wind against a mechanically aspirated standard, confirmed that it was superior to the conventional Stevenson screen (Erell et al, 2005), which has been shown to produce some error in such conditions (World-Meteorological-Organization, 1971;Sparks, 1972;Andersson and Mathisson, 1992;van der Meulen, 1998). However, error due to radiant load cannot be ruled out entirely when relatively large sensors are used, such as the thermistors employed in this experiment, and deviations of up to 1°C from 'true' air temperature are nonetheless possible.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erell et al (2005), Richardson et al (1999), have recognized that temperature accuracy improves with decrease in sensor size because the convective heat exchange efficiency improves. This suggests the use of a temperature sensor small enough to maximize ventilation efficiency but durable enough to withstand weather extremes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various shapes of solar radiation shields have been proposed and evaluated (Peon et al, 1998;Ma et al, 2004;Erell et al, 2005). In this study, five shapes of solar radiation shields were chosen to be compared with the fan-aspirated radiation shield.…”
Section: Solar Radiation Shields To Compare With the Fan-aspirated Ramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been carried out on the performance of these solar radiation shields. Erell et al (2005) compared several shapes of radiation shields and reported that the high airflow and small surface of sensor tip reduce the measuring error. A technique to block the solar radiation and generate airflow for the sensor tip is known as the Asman psychrometer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%