2022
DOI: 10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00741-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of alpha-induced reaction cross-sections on $$^{nat}$$Mo with detailed covariance analysis

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Covariance analysis, the uncertainty propagation can be explained using the cross correlation between several observed values [32,33]. The method we have used to calculate the covariance matrix of the nuclear reaction in the present work is given in our previous article [22,34]. In the present experiment, we have used nat Ti(α, x) 51 Cr nuclear reaction as a monitor reaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Covariance analysis, the uncertainty propagation can be explained using the cross correlation between several observed values [32,33]. The method we have used to calculate the covariance matrix of the nuclear reaction in the present work is given in our previous article [22,34]. In the present experiment, we have used nat Ti(α, x) 51 Cr nuclear reaction as a monitor reaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A γ-ray spectrum of irradiated nat Cu and nat Ti foils are shown in figures 3 and 4. In our earlier paper [22], we have provided a detailed explanation of the calibration and efficiency calculations of the HPGe detector as well as its uncertainty and coincidence summing effect.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of a single crystal p-type HPGe detector was calibrated at various characteristic γ-ray energies using a standard 152 Eu point source (T 1/2 = 13.517 ± 0.009 y) of known activity (A 0 = 6614.71 ± 81.33 Bq as of 1 October 1999). The efficiency of the detector for the point source geometry was evaluated using the following equation given in [26,27] ( ) e = There are various sources of uncertainty in the calibration process, which generates uncertainty in the detectors efficiency. These uncertainties are from C, I, A 0 , and λ parameters respectively.…”
Section: Covariance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%