2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.88.072012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of an excess ofB¯D(*)τν

Abstract: Based on the full BABAR data sample, we report improved measurements of the ratios RðDÞ ¼ BðB ! D À Þ=BðB ! D' À ' Þ and RðD Ã Þ ¼ BðB ! D Ã À Þ=BðB ! D Ã ' À ' Þ, where ' refers to either an electron or muon. These ratios are sensitive to new physics contributions in the form of a charged Higgs boson. We measure RðDÞ ¼ 0:440 AE 0:058 AE 0:042 and RðD Ã Þ ¼ 0:332 AE 0:024 AE 0:018, which exceed the standard model expectations by 2:0 and 2:7, respectively. Taken together, the results disagree with these expecta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

18
724
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 760 publications
(747 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
18
724
4
Order By: Relevance
“…in tables 2 and 3 with selections of the q 2 bins identical to that from the Belle and BaBar measurements [71,72]. In particular, our predictions for the total decay width of B → Dµν µ in units of 1/|V cb | 2 can be obtained straightforwardly with the recent experimental measurements of the total branching fraction from the Belle [71] and BaBar [73] Collaborations.…”
Section: Jhep06(2017)062mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…in tables 2 and 3 with selections of the q 2 bins identical to that from the Belle and BaBar measurements [71,72]. In particular, our predictions for the total decay width of B → Dµν µ in units of 1/|V cb | 2 can be obtained straightforwardly with the recent experimental measurements of the total branching fraction from the Belle [71] and BaBar [73] Collaborations.…”
Section: Jhep06(2017)062mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In fact, BaBar excludes the latter contributions as an explanation of the deviations in R(D) and R(D * ) from their SM predictions [82]. Moreover, and as discussed in [83], the observed excess on R(D) (and R(D * )) also fails to be explained in large portions of the more general type-III 2HDM. Similarly, the authors of ref.…”
Section: Jhep02(2014)091mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined results of BaBar [1,2], Belle [3][4][5][6] and LHCb [7] read [8] R(D) = 0.403 ± 0.047, R(D * ) = 0.310 ± 0.017, ρ = −0.23,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%