2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of bacterial volume by transmission-through-dye imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously TTD microscopy was used for mammalian cells or pure bacterial cultures [8]. Here we present several examples that show that TTD is highly effective for recognizing live cells in environmental samples, even those heavily contaminated with dead matter and detritus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Previously TTD microscopy was used for mammalian cells or pure bacterial cultures [8]. Here we present several examples that show that TTD is highly effective for recognizing live cells in environmental samples, even those heavily contaminated with dead matter and detritus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…To confirm that the Surface-FISH signals are not a result of RNA leakage from damaged cell membranes, we combined Malat1 Surface-FISH with a transmission-through-dye (TTD) microscopic analysis, where only live cells with intact membranes are fluorescently labeled [ 16 18 ] (Additional file 1 : Fig. S3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one method, the V in value is considered as a constant of 2.3 μL·mg −1 based on the general knowledge that all living organisms contain about 70 wt.% water (Bennett et al, 2008). The optical methods concern cell morphology and determine the whole cell volume based on empirical equations (Lababidi et al, 2011;Loferer-Krossbacher et al, 1998). We estimated the cell volume according to the equation W = 435 × V in 0.86 (Loferer-Krossbacher et al, 1998), and obtained a V in value of 3.6 μL·mg −1 , which is 89% higher than the V in value determined by our method (Table 1).…”
Section: Comparison the V In Values Determined By Different Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%