2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-017-3402-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of belowground diversity of fine roots in subtropical forests based on a quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In several instances, a greater number of species were detected belowground than aboveground, consistent with previous reports (Pärtel et al 2012). This is likely due to the wide lateral spread of roots, with belowground species occasionally corresponding to trees from outside the plots (Kesanakurti et al 2011, Zeng et al 2017). Furthermore, we likely underestimated aboveground species richness by only including trees with a DBH ≥ 4 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In several instances, a greater number of species were detected belowground than aboveground, consistent with previous reports (Pärtel et al 2012). This is likely due to the wide lateral spread of roots, with belowground species occasionally corresponding to trees from outside the plots (Kesanakurti et al 2011, Zeng et al 2017). Furthermore, we likely underestimated aboveground species richness by only including trees with a DBH ≥ 4 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, the identification of fine roots was a limiting factor in ecological studies since the roots of distinct species closely intermingle and can be difficult to distinguish morphologically (Mommer et al 2010). Molecular methods provide an effective approach to identify roots in diverse plant communities (Jones et al 2011, Hiiesalu et al 2012, Frank et al 2015, Zeng et al 2015, 2017), making it possible to estimate standing root biomass at the species level (Valverde‐Barrantes et al 2015, Oram et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, these authors found that the DNA detected by the qPCR assays primarily originated from living cells, which overcomes the major difficulty of determining living versus dead root mass by morphological characteristics. Other studies have demonstrated that qPCR can be used to estimate the relative proportion of a given species in mixed fine-root samples from (sub) tropical forest (Zeng et al 2017) and greenhouse experiments (Mommer et al 2008). Our study is the first to utilize qPCR to quantify fine root mass in soils from natural environments, such as forest soils.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the current tools, molecular approaches have been identified as effective and reliable methods to identify roots to species (Rewald et al., ) (Table ). For instance, species‐specific primers that amplify DNA of target species have been used to amplify fragments of distinct sizes characteristic of grassland (McNickle et al., ) and forest plant species (Zeng et al., ). However, creating species‐specific primers may be impractical because sequence information is not readily available for many plant species, primers take time to test and optimize, and there is a limit to how many unique species‐specific size profiles can be created for a DNA region that is only a few hundred base pairs long.…”
Section: Comparison Of Current Molecular Methods Available To Identifmentioning
confidence: 99%