2020
DOI: 10.3791/60429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Carotenoids in Perifovea using the Macular Pigment Reflectometer

Abstract: The macular pigment reflectometer (MPR) objectively measures the overall macular pigment optical density (MPOD) and further provides the lutein optical density (L-OD) and zeaxanthin optical density (Z-OD) in the central 1 degree of the fovea. A modification of the technique was developed to evaluate in vivo carotenoid density eccentric to the fovea. An adjustable track system with red LED lights was placed 6.1 m away from the participant to facilitate ocular fixation. Lights were spaced appropriately to create… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heterochromatic flicker photometry due to its small footprint is perhaps most common clinical device utilized to measure MPOD [4,8,10,15,16,26,41,44,45,48,66,67,72,73]. However, objective techniques such as dual-wavelength autofluorescence [74] or macular pigment reflectometry [21,75,76] could decrease variability in results, given that the participants in this study were clinical patients and not trained participants in a psychophysical study. A learning curve may account for the increase in CSF testing overtime in healthy controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Heterochromatic flicker photometry due to its small footprint is perhaps most common clinical device utilized to measure MPOD [4,8,10,15,16,26,41,44,45,48,66,67,72,73]. However, objective techniques such as dual-wavelength autofluorescence [74] or macular pigment reflectometry [21,75,76] could decrease variability in results, given that the participants in this study were clinical patients and not trained participants in a psychophysical study. A learning curve may account for the increase in CSF testing overtime in healthy controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the improvement in CSF was not statistically significant in the healthy group, a trend showing improvement was visible. Additionally, macular pigment reflectometry could provide in vivo carotenoid measurements of the lutein and zeaxanthin levels, which would be a welcome addition to the biomarker MPOD [21,75,76].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used are the psychophysical techniques HFP and cHFP [34,109,110,[134][135][136][137][138], which rely on subjective perceptions to estimate the level of MPOD [139][140][141]. Conversely, the fundus reflectometry [142][143][144][145][146][147] and autofluorescence imaging (AFI) [132,133,148,149] techniques rely on physical properties of the retina in order to collect measurements such as light reflectance and lipofuscin fluorescence, respectively [34,110,130,131,134,150,151]. It is important to note that validated measurements of MPOD levels can serve as susceptibility/risk biomarkers for the screening of early glaucomatous damage involving the macula [99], which may be clinically evident prior to central visual field loss on standard automated perimetry.…”
Section: Measuring Mpodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundus reflectometry [ 61 , 83 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 ], fundus autofluorescence [ 81 , 82 , 94 ] and resonance Raman spectroscopy [ 47 , 95 , 96 ] are all non-invasive, objective imaging modalities that can measure MPOD [ 50 , 75 ]. Details regarding both subjective and objective techniques to measure MPOD can be found in these review articles [ 27 , 45 , 46 , 50 , 75 , 82 , 94 , 97 , 98 ].…”
Section: Diabetic Retinopathy and Macular Pigmentmentioning
confidence: 99%