1993
DOI: 10.2175/wer.65.6.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of chemical sludge floc density and implications related to sludge dewatering

Abstract: An isopyenic centrifugation procedure was developed for estimating the characteristic floe density present in several chemical sludges. Issues addressed included selection of a low osmotic pressure gradient medium; selection of appropriate centrifugal acceleration and time values for testing; viscosity effects; and need for temperature control. Increases in sludge floe density were predictive of an increase in cake solids concentration following mechanical dewatering. Most sludge water removal during dewaterin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of P a is sludge specific as sludge cake compressibility can vary with floc size, sludge type, sludge conditioning, operating temperature and pH [13,24,28,29]. Therefore, P a was estimated via parameter estimation during model calibration using a non-linear least squares parameter estimation method (Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm) with TMP as fitted output and residual sum of squares (J)…”
Section: Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of P a is sludge specific as sludge cake compressibility can vary with floc size, sludge type, sludge conditioning, operating temperature and pH [13,24,28,29]. Therefore, P a was estimated via parameter estimation during model calibration using a non-linear least squares parameter estimation method (Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm) with TMP as fitted output and residual sum of squares (J)…”
Section: Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, after the solid-liquid separation by sedimentation or filtration operation, an additional separation is required to achieve a reduction in sludge volume to facilitate transport and handling operations [1]. Sludge dewatering, recognized as one of the most complex and expensive operation involved in wastewater treatment cycle [1][2][3][4][5], requires significant technical as well as economical efforts [6]. As a matter of a fact, 1t of fresh sludge to be disposed is composed, on average, by 0.25-0.30t of suspended solids (SS), with a cost for treatment and disposal around €280-470/t [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A better understanding of sludge dewatering features, could lead to an improvement in pretreatment approaches focused to enhance the dewaterability efficiency [6]. In detail, Vesilind et al [8] have defined four different types of water contained in sludge: free [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] www.deswater.com doi: 10.1080/19443994.2016.1180478 water, interstitial water, vicinal water, and water of hydratation. More in detail, free water can be easily separated by gravitational settling; interstitial water separation can be achieved only by mechanical dewatering devices, such as centrifugation or vacuum filtration; vicinal water, physically bound to solid particles surface, cannot be separated by any mechanical device.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wastewater treatment processes produce large amounts of sludge, which commonly contains over 90% water [1], and has been addressed as an environmental issue for the past decades [2,3]. Sludge handling and disposal treatments account for up to 50% of total wastewater treatment costs for large plants [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%