2016
DOI: 10.1080/10715762.2016.1232484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of complex DNA damage induction and repair in human cellular systems after exposure to ionizing radiations of varying linear energy transfer (LET)

Abstract: Detrimental effects of ionizing radiation (IR) are correlated to the varying efficiency of IR to induce complex DNA damage. A double strand break (DSB) can be considered the simpler form of complex DNA damage. These types of damage can consist of DSBs, single strand breaks (SSBs) and/or non-DSB lesions such as base damages and apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP; abasic) sites in different combinations. Enthralling theoretical (Monte Carlo simulations) and experimental evidence suggests an increase in the complexity of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
97
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
97
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…G1 arrest generally results from p53 activation in response to DNA damage (Bernhard et al, 1995), which was evidenced with enrichment analysis and the formation of γH2AX and TP53BP1 foci. To determine the complexity of the DNA damage after exposure to ionizing radiation, future studies should look at the colocalization between DSB and non-DSB damage (Nikitaki et al, 2016). G1 arrest was followed by a progressive restoration of cell cycling for all doses, except for 2 Gy where cell cycling restoration was followed by an additional G1 arrest, which coincided with increased senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity and IGFBP7 secretion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G1 arrest generally results from p53 activation in response to DNA damage (Bernhard et al, 1995), which was evidenced with enrichment analysis and the formation of γH2AX and TP53BP1 foci. To determine the complexity of the DNA damage after exposure to ionizing radiation, future studies should look at the colocalization between DSB and non-DSB damage (Nikitaki et al, 2016). G1 arrest was followed by a progressive restoration of cell cycling for all doses, except for 2 Gy where cell cycling restoration was followed by an additional G1 arrest, which coincided with increased senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity and IGFBP7 secretion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another point to consider is that low doses of irradiation in the infected lungs, even at doses up to 0.5 Gy, are expected to induce a low number of RNA damage events and mutations in the virus and be of a low selective pressure. For a dose of 0.5 Gy in an approximately 30 kb singlestranded virus genome, about 0.005 single-strand breaks (SSBs)/virus are expected (assuming~1000 SSBs per~3 Gb genome) and up to 5-6 times more base damage [17,18]. SARS-COV-2 is an RNA virus with an expected moderate to high mutation rate similar to other SARS RNA viruses and usually higher than the corresponding rate of the human host cells [19].…”
Section: Evidence On Low-dose Irradiation For Treatment Of Pneumoniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Damages by ROS to proteins or membranes are mostly tolerable, but might also lead to changes in the microenvironment . Detrimental effects of ionizing radiation are mostly based on the induction of DNA damage . However, cells are confronted with DNA lesions every day and therefore have developed extensive repair mechanisms to secure their survival.…”
Section: Basic Biological Effects Of Ionizing Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Detrimental effects of ionizing radiation are mostly based on the induction of DNA damage. 16 However, cells are confronted with DNA lesions every day and therefore have developed extensive repair mechanisms to secure their survival. In general, DNA single strand breaks (SSBs) are repaired fast and accurate.…”
Section: Basic Biological Effects Of Ionizing Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%