2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2003.10.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of crack induced damping of cast magnesium alloy AZ91

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strain independent part is overlapped by another mechanism to be taken into account when using higher starting strain amplitudes. This mechanism is plastic deformation and was shown in a previous paper on fatigue-dependent damping [7] . Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The strain independent part is overlapped by another mechanism to be taken into account when using higher starting strain amplitudes. This mechanism is plastic deformation and was shown in a previous paper on fatigue-dependent damping [7] . Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Anasori et al [34] found that the high damping of Ti 2 AlC itself is the main reason for the high damping performance of Ti 2 ALC-Mg composites upon adding TiC and Ti 2 AlC particles to a magnesium alloy, and. J. Göken et al [35] found that cracks may also be used as damping sources to increase the damping properties of magnesium alloys. The diffusion process at the crack tip is considered the main mechanism of crack-induced damping.…”
Section: Dislocation Damping Mechanism In Magnesium Alloysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extra vibrational damping produced in the test piece due to the presence of fatigue crack, in general, would depend on the size and properties of the crack (including the size and shape of the plastic zone around the crack tip) and distribution of stress concentration around the crack at the time it is under vibration. This extra damping caused by the presence of crack (Z Crack,N ) can be found from the difference between the measured loss factor of the cracked sample in vibration mode N (Z CrackedBeam,N ) and the measured loss factor of another sample with the same geometry and without the presence of crack at the same vibration mode N: Bovsunovsky (2004) and Goken et al (2004) have concluded in their studies that vibration damping in structures containing cracks has a tendency to decrease in response to an increase in the amplitude of vibration, whereas in structures without cracks, the level of vibrational damping stemmed from structural damping of the material, it increases along with an increase in the amplitude of vibration. They also reported that the energy wasted per unit strain in every cycle during vibration of beam-like structures (ÁV) can be considered independent of a structure's vibration frequency even if strains with large amplitude occur in the sample.…”
Section: Proposed Algorithm For Estimation Of Vibration Damping and Heat Dissipation By Crackmentioning
confidence: 99%