2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of cross link densities of prevulcanized natural rubber latex and latex products using low-cost near infrared spectrometer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies by Lim and Sirisomboon of crosslink density of natural rubber film developed from prevulcanized latex model which was created by PLSR using the spectra scanned by FT-NIR spectrometer [ 3 ], the natural rubber thin film model provided the r 2 , root mean square error of cross validation and bias of 0.65, 4.01%TSI and −0.028%TSI, respectively, using the wavenumber range of 6102–5446.3 cm −1 and 4428–4242.9 cm −1 (1639–1836 nm (included natural rubber absorption bands) and 2258–2357 nm), whereas for the natural rubber thick film model the r 2 , root mean square error of cross validation and bias were 0.70, 4.00%TSI and −0.006%TSI, respectively, using the wavenumber range of 6102–4597.7 cm −1 (1639–2175 nm (included natural rubber absorption bands)). By using the low-cost VIS/NIR diode array spectrometer in the wavelength range of 450–1000 nm using a fiber optic probe scanned on the thin and thick film, the models for crosslink density indicated by prevulcanisate relaxed modulus (PRM) had poor results, as indicated by the R 2 of calibration and RMSEC of 0.02 and 17.31 × 10 4 N/m 2 and 0.05 and 16.63 × 10 4 N/m 2 , respectively [ 43 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies by Lim and Sirisomboon of crosslink density of natural rubber film developed from prevulcanized latex model which was created by PLSR using the spectra scanned by FT-NIR spectrometer [ 3 ], the natural rubber thin film model provided the r 2 , root mean square error of cross validation and bias of 0.65, 4.01%TSI and −0.028%TSI, respectively, using the wavenumber range of 6102–5446.3 cm −1 and 4428–4242.9 cm −1 (1639–1836 nm (included natural rubber absorption bands) and 2258–2357 nm), whereas for the natural rubber thick film model the r 2 , root mean square error of cross validation and bias were 0.70, 4.00%TSI and −0.006%TSI, respectively, using the wavenumber range of 6102–4597.7 cm −1 (1639–2175 nm (included natural rubber absorption bands)). By using the low-cost VIS/NIR diode array spectrometer in the wavelength range of 450–1000 nm using a fiber optic probe scanned on the thin and thick film, the models for crosslink density indicated by prevulcanisate relaxed modulus (PRM) had poor results, as indicated by the R 2 of calibration and RMSEC of 0.02 and 17.31 × 10 4 N/m 2 and 0.05 and 16.63 × 10 4 N/m 2 , respectively [ 43 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lim et al proposed to determine the densities of cross linking in latex by an innovative method based on portable NIR ( Lim et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Applications To Wood Cellulose Lignin and Lignitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…NIR spectroscopy have been studied for feasibility determination of cross link density of rubber latex such as cross link density determined by prevulcanisate relaxed modulus (PRM) test [1] using NIR Fourier Transform spectrometer (FT-NIR) and [2] using low cost spectrometer (LCS) and toluene swell test [3] using FT-NIR, when reference methods has been used in rubber latex factory. For prevulcanized latex an effective model was developed using partial least squares regression with preprocessing (first derivative + straight line subtraction method).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficient of determination (R 2 ), root mean square error of cross validation of the calibration set were 0.85 and 2.98% and coefficient of determination (r 2 ), root mean square error of cross validation and bias of the validation set were 0.71, 3.93% and -0.005%, respectively. By PRM test for PV 50% (prevulcanised latex of 50% total solids content), FT-NIR gave coefficient of determination of validation (r 2 ) and root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) of 0.88 and 6.74×104 Nm -2 , respectively, while scanned PV50 latex in quartz cup [1] and LCS gave 0.70 and 8.13×104 Nm-2, respectively, while dipped probe in PV50 latex in glass beaker [2]. For FT-NIR spectrometer to be used in prevulcanized latex production, Williams et al [4] indicated this model was for screening and some other approximate calibration (r 2 is between 0.66-0.81).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%