2012
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1211764109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of energy landscape roughness of folded and unfolded proteins

Abstract: The dynamics of protein conformational changes, from protein folding to smaller changes, such as those involved in ligand binding, are governed by the properties of the conformational energy landscape. Different techniques have been used to follow the motion of a protein over this landscape and thus quantify its properties. However, these techniques often are limited to short timescales and low-energy conformations. Here, we describe a general approach that overcomes these limitations. Starting from a nonnativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
66
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
8
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were found for a wide range of parameters. 32 Thus, the experimentally observed power law time dependence k inst (t) B t À0.94 over nine orders of magnitude in time can be reproduced almost perfectly with simulations assuming a wide range of local trapping times which leads to subdiffusive motion of the peptide segments to which the radicals are bound, whereas normal diffusion is not able to reproduce this power dependence even when accounting for the tethering, chain stiffness and excluded volume effects of the polypeptide backbone. This provides compelling evidence that the relative motion of polypeptide backbone segments is strongly subdiffusive, with a subdiffusional parameter a of around 0.3.…”
Section: Subdiffusionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were found for a wide range of parameters. 32 Thus, the experimentally observed power law time dependence k inst (t) B t À0.94 over nine orders of magnitude in time can be reproduced almost perfectly with simulations assuming a wide range of local trapping times which leads to subdiffusive motion of the peptide segments to which the radicals are bound, whereas normal diffusion is not able to reproduce this power dependence even when accounting for the tethering, chain stiffness and excluded volume effects of the polypeptide backbone. This provides compelling evidence that the relative motion of polypeptide backbone segments is strongly subdiffusive, with a subdiffusional parameter a of around 0.3.…”
Section: Subdiffusionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We then describe a recently reported alternative approach for the experimental characterisation of backbone dynamics and energy landscape roughness. 32 Most interestingly, these results show that the polypeptide backbone does not follow normal diffusional behaviour, but undergoes subdiffusional motion due to a wide range of trapping times arising from the hierarchy of local energy minima on the rough energy landscape. Analysis of the experimental observations allows a quantitative determination of the roughness.…”
Section: Godfrey S Beddardmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Biophysical Journal 108(5) 1153-1164 perhaps even artificially so compared to explicit solvent (53) and, possibly, reality (95).…”
Section: Mixed Casementioning
confidence: 98%
“…These lead to the concept of a multidimensional potential energy landscape (EL) that specifies a complete description of CSs in proteins (6)(7)(8)(9). The existence of an EL was proposed by H. Frauenfelder and others in the 1970s and has been validated both by computations and by experiments (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%