1995
DOI: 10.3327/jnst.32.404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Fragment Mass Dependent Kinetic Energy and Neutron Multiplicity for Thermal Neutron Induced Fission of Plutonium-239.

Abstract: Kinetic energy and neutron multiplicity a s a function of fragment inass were measured for the thermal neutron induced fission of 239Pu. By measuring the velocities and energies of t w o fission fragments simultaneously. both of the pre-neutron emission fragment mass nz* and the post-neutron inass In were obtained. 'l'he fragment mass dependent neutron multiplicity ii (m') was deduced by subtracting v z from n z '. T h e fragment mass dependent total kinetic energy TKE(?n*) was also obtained from this data. T … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
52
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Part of this agreement comes from the fact that both calculations and experimental data are convolutions of a raw data set with a smoothing function: The Schillebeeckx et al [57] data comes from a 2E measurement with a mass resolution of typically 4-5 mass units (FWHM) [59]. A measurement of both energy and velocity of the two fragments as the one performed by Nishio et al [58] is also expected to provide a mass resolution significantly larger than one mass unit. These experimental characteristics partly motivated our choice of a σ = 4 Gaussian smoothing function, together with the arguments presented in Sec.…”
Section: Fission Yields Obtained With Skm* and D1smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Part of this agreement comes from the fact that both calculations and experimental data are convolutions of a raw data set with a smoothing function: The Schillebeeckx et al [57] data comes from a 2E measurement with a mass resolution of typically 4-5 mass units (FWHM) [59]. A measurement of both energy and velocity of the two fragments as the one performed by Nishio et al [58] is also expected to provide a mass resolution significantly larger than one mass unit. These experimental characteristics partly motivated our choice of a σ = 4 Gaussian smoothing function, together with the arguments presented in Sec.…”
Section: Fission Yields Obtained With Skm* and D1smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of D1S, the endpoint of this valley, located in the region Q 30 ∈ [25,50] (color online) Pre-neutron mass yields for 239 Pu(n,f). The SkM* and D1S calculations are compared with two experimental datasets [57,58]. The data from Nishio et al are plotted with their statistical uncertainties.…”
Section: Fission Yields Obtained With Skm* and D1smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The figure also shows the calculated width in the fragment energy distribution, together with a few typical experimental widths provided by Ref. [27].…”
Section: Fragment Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 were obtained in experiments using thermal neutrons [26][27][28]. Unfortunately, there are no such data for higher incident energy.…”
Section: Fragment Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of this agreement comes from the fact that both calculations and experimental data are convolutions of a raw data set with a smoothing function: The Schillebeeckx et al [15] data comes from a 2E measurement with a mass resolution of typically 4-5 mass units (FWHM) [20]. A measurement of both energy and velocity of the two fragments as the one performed by Nishio et al [16] is also expected to provide a mass resolution significantly larger than one mass unit. Finally, the TDGCM dataset itself results from the convolution of a raw probability flux with a Gaussian of width σ = 4 mass units.…”
Section: Prediction Of Actinide Fission Yields Based On Two Collectivmentioning
confidence: 99%