2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2016.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of glenohumeral joint translation using real-time ultrasound imaging: A physiotherapist and sonographer intra-rater and inter-rater reliability study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Borsa et al 4 reported the use of the posterior approach and validated ultrasound assessment as having good repeatability for asymptomatic shoulder translation, compared with stress radiography. Rathi et al 28 compared the anterior and posterior ultrasonographic approaches and concluded that the posterior approach had greater intra- and interrater reliability. Importantly, the posterior approach is advantageous because the scapular spine is useful as a bony landmark, which can be used to set the probe at a reproducible position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Borsa et al 4 reported the use of the posterior approach and validated ultrasound assessment as having good repeatability for asymptomatic shoulder translation, compared with stress radiography. Rathi et al 28 compared the anterior and posterior ultrasonographic approaches and concluded that the posterior approach had greater intra- and interrater reliability. Importantly, the posterior approach is advantageous because the scapular spine is useful as a bony landmark, which can be used to set the probe at a reproducible position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, the interobserver reliability was moderate (ICC 2,1 , 0.724) and intraobserver reliability was good (ICC 1,1 , 0.810), which was comparable with previous reports that used the posterior approach. 4 , 28 This study had the advantage of using a dynamometer to perform quantitative distraction force to the humeral head during the translation test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinically, ultrasound is increasingly used as a quantitative assessment of anterior translation since it allows users to evaluate the translation dynamically and non‐invasively [13, 26, 27]. Quantitative ultrasonographic assessment of anterior translation of the glenohumeral joint was first reported in 1999 [13], and other researchers followed this standard ultrasonographic technique [10, 26, 27]. The current standard, quantitative ultrasonographic technique claims to be able to assess the distance between the humeral head and glenoid from the anterolateral aspect of the shoulder using three landmarks: coracoid process, glenoid, and humeral head [13, 26, 27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference of the distance before and after applying an anterior load is used to measure anterior translation. This standard ultrasonographic technique has sufficient intra‐observer repeatability (intra‐class correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.85–0.96) [26, 27]. However, inter‐observer repeatability is reported as poor to moderate (ICC, 0.31–0.75), possibly arising from the difficulty of visualizing the glenoid due to the acoustic shadow created by the coracoid process [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation