Volume 6: 33rd Design Automation Conference, Parts a and B 2007
DOI: 10.1115/detc2007-35409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Headlight Form Preference Using a Choice Based Conjoint Analysis

Abstract: The measurement and understanding of user aesthetic preference for form is a critical element to the product development process and has been a design challenge for many years. In this article preference is represented in a utility function directly related to the engineering representation for the automobile headlight. A method is proposed to solicit and measure customer preferences for shape of the automobile headlight using a choice task on a main-effects conjoint survey design to discover and design the mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Kelly, et al's work, two attributes were varied to generate different shape of a cola bottle [21]. In Swamy, et al's work, four-control-point Bezier curves were defined to generate the shape of a vehicle headlight [22]. In Orsborn, et al's study, seven attributes were determined to fully describe the outline of an SUV [4].…”
Section: Conjoint Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Kelly, et al's work, two attributes were varied to generate different shape of a cola bottle [21]. In Swamy, et al's work, four-control-point Bezier curves were defined to generate the shape of a vehicle headlight [22]. In Orsborn, et al's study, seven attributes were determined to fully describe the outline of an SUV [4].…”
Section: Conjoint Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling these preferences as continuous by interpolating between the utility values of the discrete categories may provide increased insight into product design and R&D investment strategy. This is left for future work as it will require linking qualitative customer measurements to quantitative values, for example via customer trials[see 35,36].…”
Section: Figure 2 Part-worth Utilities Of Paper Towel Attributes Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These part-worths are shown in Fig. 2, and also detailed in [36] along with the part-worths , , , , , and , , for the competitors.…”
Section: Figure 6 Sensitivity Of Profit To κmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to a previous study [13], the shape of the headlight was modeled with two 4-control points Bezier curves (P0, P1, P2, P) for the upper contour and (P, P3, P4, P0) for the lower (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of choice based and rating based conjoint concerning the design of cars' front-ends is presented in [12]. In [13], a method is proposed to measure customer preference of automobile headlights using Choice Based Conjoint analysis, and an interesting parameterization of the design variables of the headlights is defined. But the main limitation of conjoint analysis is that it works with qualitative factors, with various modalities (or levels).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%