1992
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-58113-7_123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Highly Active Isotope Fission Cross Sections with Nuclear Explosion Neutrons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 Top: total, elastic, inelastic, fission and capture cross sections for 244 Cm compared to the Gianotti model calculations [106] and the measurements [107][108][109][110][111][112]. Bottom: fission and capture cross sections for 244 Cm compared to the JENDL-4.0 and ENDF/B-VII.1 evaluations, the Gianotti model calculations [106] and the measurements [107][108][109][110][111][112] used. Fission cross sections were derived in the WKB approximation supposing a double-humped fission barrier with free parameters that were adjusted to experimental cross section data [99].…”
Section: Curiummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…18 Top: total, elastic, inelastic, fission and capture cross sections for 244 Cm compared to the Gianotti model calculations [106] and the measurements [107][108][109][110][111][112]. Bottom: fission and capture cross sections for 244 Cm compared to the JENDL-4.0 and ENDF/B-VII.1 evaluations, the Gianotti model calculations [106] and the measurements [107][108][109][110][111][112] used. Fission cross sections were derived in the WKB approximation supposing a double-humped fission barrier with free parameters that were adjusted to experimental cross section data [99].…”
Section: Curiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[107][108][109][110][111][112]. The correlation of total and fission cross sections for 244 Cm and the uncertainties compared to the measurements [106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119] Covariance data were generated by the Kalman code implemented in the EMPIRE system supposing a 10% uncertainty on the model parameters. These uncertainties were complemented in a Bayesian updating procedure with the experimental fission cross section data listed in Table 11.…”
Section: Curiummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concerning 244 Cm, we took account of the measured fission cross sections 11,12,21,[28][29][30] given in Table 3 for the GMA analysis above 1 keV. The data reported before 1970 were ignored in the present work.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%