2016
DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1190974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement ofBCR-ABL1transcripts on the International Scale in the United States: current status and best practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There should be an accepted method for standardizing reporting of molecular responses. This is the one used by most locales today, but it still has not been adopted universally . Additionally, the laboratory must have adequate quality control mechanisms to ensure that the results provided are accurate and reproducible.…”
Section: Molecular Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There should be an accepted method for standardizing reporting of molecular responses. This is the one used by most locales today, but it still has not been adopted universally . Additionally, the laboratory must have adequate quality control mechanisms to ensure that the results provided are accurate and reproducible.…”
Section: Molecular Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RQ‐PCR has become an increasingly standard technique, yet still more sensitive techniques may be used in the future. Digital PCR is reported to be 100 times more sensitive than RQ‐PCR, which can detect a single BCR‐ABL1+ cell out of 10 7 cells .…”
Section: Molecular Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to the high sensitivity of molecular methods to detect BCR-ABL1 transcripts, deeper molecular responses can now be ascertained, including major molecular response (MMR), MR4 or MR4.5 (4 and 4.5- log reduction of BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts, respectively), and molecularly undetectable leukemia (MUL). 2, 3 It seems intuitive that the deeper the treatment response, the better the survival of patients with CML-CP is. 4, 5 However, multiple studies have shown that deeper responses beyond CCyR confer no survival benefit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current recommendations for the definition of MRs may be changed after accumulation of further data. Although we performed all experimental procedures with great care, the introduction of some errors caused by human factors cannot be completely excluded, as noted in a recent commentary (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%