1988
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(88)90702-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of interaction cross sections using isotope beams of Be and B and isospin dependence of the nuclear radii

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

42
359
7
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 732 publications
(409 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
42
359
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1) and thus smaller matter radii, R m = 2.621 fm and R m = 2.670 fm compared to 2.945 fm in 11 Li. Our theoretically calculated R m for 6 He is in closer agreement with the value from the reanalysis of the data deduced from total interaction cross sections [5] performed by Al-Khalili et al [45]. As for 6 Li, the result from the present calculation exceeds the value R m = 2.32(3) fm from Tanihata et al [5], but almost coincides with the value R m = 2.45(7) fm deduced from the recent proton scattering experiments at GSI [23].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1) and thus smaller matter radii, R m = 2.621 fm and R m = 2.670 fm compared to 2.945 fm in 11 Li. Our theoretically calculated R m for 6 He is in closer agreement with the value from the reanalysis of the data deduced from total interaction cross sections [5] performed by Al-Khalili et al [45]. As for 6 Li, the result from the present calculation exceeds the value R m = 2.32(3) fm from Tanihata et al [5], but almost coincides with the value R m = 2.45(7) fm deduced from the recent proton scattering experiments at GSI [23].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The diffuseness parameter is defined as the distance over which the value of the density decreases in the surface region from 90% to 10% of its value in the center of the nucleus divided by 4.4. For comparison we give additionally in Table I the nuclear matter radii of 4 He, 6 He, 8 He, and 6 Li, 11 Li deduced from the proton scattering experiments at GSI [23], from the data on total interaction cross sections σ I [1,2,4] obtained from an analysis of Tanihata et al [5,6] and from a more recent reanalysis [45,46] of the same data. We present in Table I for a comparison also the experimental charge rms radii for 4 He and 6 Li from [54,59,61] and in Table II those for 58,62 Ni and 116,118 Sn from [61] and for 82,92,94 Kr from [76].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [154] the Glauber approximation while in [155] the usual adiabatic Schrdinger model are used for the radial wave function. The result of the analysis of the total reaction cross section in [154] of 11 Li,11 Be, and 8 B and a 12 C target, demonstrated that the breakup channel coupling necessarily increases the reaction cross section and accordingly requires a larger rms radius of the halo nucleus, as seemed to be required by the data on the interaction cross section (the total reaction cross section without the projectile inelastic or breakup contributions) at the time, which were analyzed using the optical, eikonal, approximation [156,157]. This result is easily understood using the general structure of the transmission coefficient , smaller than the optical one, σ R,opt = 2π ∞ 0 bdbT opt (b).…”
Section: Coupled Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%