1961
DOI: 10.1017/s002211206100086x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of interfacial structure for co-current air–water flow

Abstract: A method for measuring the interfacial structure between a co-current air-water flow using the absorption of light is described. Measurements of the root-meansquared displacement and the frequency spectrum are presented. The use of a Gaussian model to describe the interface is explored.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the fluid properties are constant (air and water at atmospheric conditions) for all experiments. As an assumption, the effect of phase velocities will be given by the relative velocity, U br = U bg − U bl , and the wave height will be taken as the mode of the probability density functions of H. A dimensional analysis gives rise to the following relation (Lilleleht & Hanratty, 1961):…”
Section: Short Note On the Depth Limited Mode Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the fluid properties are constant (air and water at atmospheric conditions) for all experiments. As an assumption, the effect of phase velocities will be given by the relative velocity, U br = U bg − U bl , and the wave height will be taken as the mode of the probability density functions of H. A dimensional analysis gives rise to the following relation (Lilleleht & Hanratty, 1961):…”
Section: Short Note On the Depth Limited Mode Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available methods can be classified based on the physical principles, acoustic, electrical or optical, involved for the measurements. In particular, numerous optical methods have been developed, including interferometry methods (Ohyama et al 1988), fluorescence intensity methods (Makarytchev et al 2001), methods based on imaging a diffusive liquid (Berhanu & Falcon 2013) or light absorption methods (Lilleleht & Hanratty 1961;Kim & Kim 2005). Mouza et al (2000) compared two methods to measure liquid film thickness, a photometric technique based on the absorption of light passing through a layer of dyed liquid and a conductance measurement and found a very good agreement between these two methods.…”
Section: Sheet Thickness Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty of the extension coefficient U γ p , on the other hand, does not depend on the operating condition but only on the calibration. From eq.10 it is: (14) and leads to a relative uncertainty of U γ g /γ g = 2%. Introducing eq.14 and eq.12 in eq.11 gives the thickness uncertainty as a function of the thickness and the extinction coefficient.…”
Section: Labs Uncertainties and Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the LAbs technique the film thickness is retrieved by measuring the intensity of the light transmitted through the liquid film. Developed as a point-wise technique, using photodiods or photomultipliers as light receivers [14,15], the LAbs has later become a full field technique using digital video cameras and basic image processing operations [17][18][19]. While this method can provide high spatial and temporal resolution, its main limitation is in the assumption that the light transmittance is solely linked to light absorption, disregarding spurious effects such as light refraction, reflection or scattering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%