2005
DOI: 10.1128/aac.49.5.1907-1914.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Intracellular Didanosine and Tenofovir Phosphorylated Metabolites and Possible Interaction of the Two Drugs in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients

Abstract: Recent work has demonstrated the existence of a systemic interaction between didanosine (ddI) and tenofovir disoproxyl fumarate (TDF) that leads to a significant increase in plasma ddI levels when coadministered with TDF (40 to 50% increase). These two drugs are, respectively, nucleoside and nucleotide analogues of adenosine and efficiently inhibit the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) reverse transcriptase when transformed to their triphosphate moieties in the intracellular (IC) medium (ddA-TP and TFV-DP, re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

19
89
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
19
89
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Furthermore, in some experiments, animals that became infected despite receiving TDF as PrEP or PEP showed delayed onset of viremia and delayed seroconversion, 18,20,23 demonstrating that even in the case of incomplete protection against infection, PrEP or PEP may lead to attenuated acute infection (perhaps by allowing the immune system to gain some control of the virus). The demonstrated efficacy of TDF in the treatment of HIV infection, the lack of reported serious safety problems associated with its use, 24 its long halflife, [25][26][27][28] and its relatively high threshold to drug resistance 29 make this antiretroviral agent an attractive candidate for systemic or topical prophylactic use. Tenofovir and related drugs have high concentrations in genital tissues, [30][31][32] so repeated exposure with locally aborted HIV infection is theoretically possible and, if it occurs, may lead to the development of HIVspecific cellular immune responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Furthermore, in some experiments, animals that became infected despite receiving TDF as PrEP or PEP showed delayed onset of viremia and delayed seroconversion, 18,20,23 demonstrating that even in the case of incomplete protection against infection, PrEP or PEP may lead to attenuated acute infection (perhaps by allowing the immune system to gain some control of the virus). The demonstrated efficacy of TDF in the treatment of HIV infection, the lack of reported serious safety problems associated with its use, 24 its long halflife, [25][26][27][28] and its relatively high threshold to drug resistance 29 make this antiretroviral agent an attractive candidate for systemic or topical prophylactic use. Tenofovir and related drugs have high concentrations in genital tissues, [30][31][32] so repeated exposure with locally aborted HIV infection is theoretically possible and, if it occurs, may lead to the development of HIVspecific cellular immune responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we could not conclude that the single administration of FTC/TDF 2 weeks before virus challenge had no preventive effect. The median intracellular half-life of TDF was estimated to be approximately 150 to 180 h, and TDF was still detectable in some patients 14 and 28 days after the administration of the last dose (28,29). The long half-life of TDF might account for the results seen in group 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…NRTIs require three phosphorylations, and this process is influenced by a number of cellular factors including cell type, cell cycle, and the activation and infection status of the cell in which they occur [45]. In particular, the initial phosphorylation by nucleoside kinases is believed to be rate-limiting [46]. In contrast, NtRTIs undergo only two phosphorylation steps and it is the initial rate-limiting step of the NRTI activation process that is not required [46].…”
Section: Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the initial phosphorylation by nucleoside kinases is believed to be rate-limiting [46]. In contrast, NtRTIs undergo only two phosphorylation steps and it is the initial rate-limiting step of the NRTI activation process that is not required [46]. Consequently, NtRTIs are more suitable for development as microbicides than the NRTIs.…”
Section: Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%