38th IAHR World Congress - "Water: Connecting the World" 2019
DOI: 10.3850/38wc092019-1109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Lateral and Wake Flows Associated With Streamscale Willow Patches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flume studies are by definition unable to capture all the spatial scales that may be relevant for hydrodynamic processes in natural systems (Bouma et al, 2007). Field and large‐scale studies involving patches of real‐scale riparian vegetation remain scarce (Berends et al, 2020; Ji et al, 2016; Västilä et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2021). Simulating vegetation with simplified rigid surrogates in physical and numerical models disregards the seasonality and flexibility‐induced flow modifications that may be relevant for understanding and modelling hydromorphological and ecological processes in natural systems (Caroppi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flume studies are by definition unable to capture all the spatial scales that may be relevant for hydrodynamic processes in natural systems (Bouma et al, 2007). Field and large‐scale studies involving patches of real‐scale riparian vegetation remain scarce (Berends et al, 2020; Ji et al, 2016; Västilä et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2021). Simulating vegetation with simplified rigid surrogates in physical and numerical models disregards the seasonality and flexibility‐induced flow modifications that may be relevant for understanding and modelling hydromorphological and ecological processes in natural systems (Caroppi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining the results of Ref. [39], sparse or lowcoverage canopies situated in the center of cross sections enhance velocities close to banks, and bankside patchy vegetation accentuates the cross-sectional velocity variability, thereby increasing the dispersion intensity. It could be preliminarily inferred that the shear stresses of velocity along the transversal direction are the main mechanism contributing to higher x k in channels with vegetation patches.…”
Section: Influence Of Vegetation Characteristics On the Longitudinal ...mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…However, the large Reynolds number and complex canopy structure in natural rivers makes it difficult to predict the velocity variations accurately. For example, the velocities in the vegetated regions are constricted by the drag force of canopies, leading to the regions with low or no flow, termed dead zones, which remarkably increases the resistance time of fine particles and contaminants in the river, floodplains, and wetlands [39] . Considering that the flexible plants in natural rivers are more common and grow in community patterns [40] , many studies have focused on the dispersion coefficient with plant clumps or flexible canopies [41][42] .…”
Section: Introduction mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, patches modify the cross‐sectional velocity distributions (Caroppi et al, 2022; Yamasaki et al, 2019) and generate turbulent fluctuations through the vortices at the lateral shear layers between each patch and open water and in the patch wake regions (e.g. Västilä et al, 2019). Smaller‐scale turbulent fluctuations are caused by wake flows associated with stems and branches, dynamic movements of flexible leaves, and coherent motions of flexible interfaces (Caroppi & Järvelä, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…90 and particularly U d indicated that shear dispersion was the main mechanism contributing to higher D x in the presence of patches. While all riverine patches generally reduce the local streamwise velocities (Figure5;Västilä et al, 2019), sparse or low blockage (B x ⪅ 0.3) patches situated in the central part of the cross-sections increased velocities close to banks, thus generating only slightly higher differential advection compared with non-vegetated conditions. By contrast, patches located particularly in low-velocity regions, such as near the banks, accentuated the cross-sectional velocity variability, hence enhancing dispersion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%