“…132 Citing these and other potential pitfalls, Kushner 337 cautioned against using the results of grating acuity to classify children as legally blind for social service purposes as doing so may overestimate their visual function and unjustifiably deny financial benefits to qualified children. While conventional visual evoked potential (VEP) testing has not proved to be a reliable method of quantitative visual evaluation in patients with cerebral palsy, mental retardation, or severe neurological disease, 19,61,176,182,395,396,557 modified techniques using sweep and step VEP may provide more accurate information.…”