2006
DOI: 10.1097/00042728-200602000-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Lower Leg Compression In Vivo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To counteract the increased intravenous pressure in the upright position, the interface pressure of a compression device should exceed 40 mmHg 7 . While in recent years, there have been several reports that have measured subbandage pressures in vivo, comparison between these studies has been compromised by the range of pressure measurement devices used in these studies, one further problem being the variability in sensor positioning upon the leg between studies 8 . Although comparison between studies is limited, one key conclusion can be drawn from the recent in vivo subbandage pressure measurements—that the subbandage pressure ranges reported for bandages that are intended to apply mild, moderate, and strong compression are clearly higher than the ranges given in BS 7505 3,4,9,10 (Table 1).…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To counteract the increased intravenous pressure in the upright position, the interface pressure of a compression device should exceed 40 mmHg 7 . While in recent years, there have been several reports that have measured subbandage pressures in vivo, comparison between these studies has been compromised by the range of pressure measurement devices used in these studies, one further problem being the variability in sensor positioning upon the leg between studies 8 . Although comparison between studies is limited, one key conclusion can be drawn from the recent in vivo subbandage pressure measurements—that the subbandage pressure ranges reported for bandages that are intended to apply mild, moderate, and strong compression are clearly higher than the ranges given in BS 7505 3,4,9,10 (Table 1).…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Vivo Assessment Stiffness, which can be defined as the increase in subbandage pressure per centimeter increase in the circumference of the leg, 8 may be a useful parameter if used to define the elasticity of a compression bandage. The segment of the lower leg that will show the most extensive increase in circumference during standing and walking is the gaiter area (measuring point B1) 17,18 .…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the correct dosage for a given situation. [1][2][3] So: i) correct prescription of stockings would be facilitated if manufacturers would provide the hysteresis curves for each of their stocking's model; ii) such measures would also help avoid the use of compression class systems, which vary significantly from country to country. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps other types of compression stockings (tailor made, flat knitted) or other compression classes would have better compliance with the target compression pressure. The resting interface pressure determines the clinical effectiveness of MCSs less than the interplay between resting and working pressure and the stiffness of the stocking does 22,23 . Compression stockings of equal resting interface pressure but different stiffness can exert different working pressures and thus differ in terms of their effectiveness at treating edema, reflux, and venous hypertension in patients with chronic venous insufficiency 24,25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%