Despite many convergences in theorizing and research on the two fundamental dimensions of social judgment the operationalizations differ considerably across studies and possible confounds (valence, frequency of word occurrence) are not always controlled. The present study was meant as a first step towards a more standardized operationalization by providing trait words which are clearly distinct in content (agency and communion) but comparable in valence and frequency of word occurrence in written language across different countries. We created a pool of 304 trait adjectives and reduced this pool in several pretests to a list of 69 trait words. These were clearly different in content and covered a large range of valence. In the main study N = 548 participants from five countries (Belgium, Germany, Italy, Poland, USA) rated the 69 trait words on agency, communion and valence. The results were quite consistent across countries. The trait adjectives' agency ratings and communion ratings were negatively correlated; valence was correlated with communal content, but not with agentic content; word frequency was barely related to the content ratings. Cluster analyses suggest four clusters of trait words. Based on these findings we propose sets of agentic and communal trait words which do not differ in valence and word frequency. These item-sets can serve as a first step towards a standardized operationalization of the two fundamental content dimensions across languages.
THE FUNDAMENTAL DIMENSIONS OPERATIONALIZED 3There has been considerable convergence in studies on the fundamental dimensions of social judgment (Abele & Wojciszke, 2007;Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, & Xu, 2002;Judd, James-Hawkins, Yzerbyt, & Kashima, 2005;Wojciszke, 2005). Researchers usually operationalize them with adjective-scales covering the two content domains. However, the specific trait words used differ considerably between studies. Furthermore, the measures used often do not control for the possibly confounding influence of valence (see Suitner & Maas, 2008) and of frequency of word occurrence. These methodological problems complicate the integration of findings of different lines of research and may decelerate progress in the field. The present study was therefore meant as a first step towards establishing sets of agentic and communal trait words that clearly capture the content of the two fundamental dimensions and at the same time do not differ regarding valence and frequency of word occurrence in written language. We collected trait ratings (content and valence) in five different countries and languages (English, USA; German, Germany; French, Belgium; Italian, Italy; and Polish, Poland). We examined the correlations between these ratings within and across languages, and we compared the classification of the trait words via cluster-analyses across languages. The study was specifically designed for this Special Issue of the European Journal of Social Psychology on Fundamental Dimensions of Social Judgment. Since most of the papers in this issu...