2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.70.037101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement ofK+π0π0e

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At that time, in the framework of current algebra and under the assumption of a unique and constant form factor F [8], the K 00 e4 decay rate and form factor values were related by Γ = (0.75 ± 0.05) |V us • F | 2 10 3 s −1 . In 2004, the E470 experiment at KEK [9] reported an observation of 214 candidates in a study of stopped kaon decays in an active target. Due to a very low geometrical acceptance and large systematics, the partial rate measurement did not reflect the gain in statistics and was not included in the most recent world averages of the Particle Data Group [10], BR = (2.2 ± 0.4) × 10 −5 , unchanged since the 1990's, corresponding to the model dependent form factor value |V us • F | = 1.54 ± 0.15.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At that time, in the framework of current algebra and under the assumption of a unique and constant form factor F [8], the K 00 e4 decay rate and form factor values were related by Γ = (0.75 ± 0.05) |V us • F | 2 10 3 s −1 . In 2004, the E470 experiment at KEK [9] reported an observation of 214 candidates in a study of stopped kaon decays in an active target. Due to a very low geometrical acceptance and large systematics, the partial rate measurement did not reflect the gain in statistics and was not included in the most recent world averages of the Particle Data Group [10], BR = (2.2 ± 0.4) × 10 −5 , unchanged since the 1990's, corresponding to the model dependent form factor value |V us • F | = 1.54 ± 0.15.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%