Measurement of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">B</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>Υ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="tru

Huang, G. S.; Miller, D. H.; Pavlunin, V.; Sanghi, B.; Shipsey, I. P. J.; Xin, B.; Adams, G. S.; Anderson, M.; Cummings, J. P.; Dankó, I.; Napolitano, J.; He, Q.; Insler, J.; Muramatsu, H.; Park, C. S.; Thorndike, E. H.; Yang, F.; Coan, T. E.; Gao, Y. S.; Liu, F.; Artuso, M.; Blusk, S.; Butt, J.; Li, J.; Menaa, N.; Mountain, R.; Nisar, S.; Randrianarivony, K.; Redjimi, R.; Sia, R.; Skwarnicki, T.; Stone, S.; Wang, J. C.; Zhang, K.; Csorna, S. E.; Bonvicini, G.; Cinabro, D.; Dubrovin, M.; Lincoln, A.; Asner, D. M.; Edwards, K. W.; Briere, R. A.; Brock, I. C.; Chen, J.; Ferguson, T.; Tatishvili, G.; Vogel, H.; Watkins, M. E.; Rosner, Jonathan L.; Adam, N.; Alexander, J. P.; Berkelman, K.; Cassel, D. G.; Duboscq, J. E.; Ecklund, K. M.; Ehrlich, R.; Fields, L.; Gibbons, L.; Gray, R.; Gray, S. W.; Hartill, D. L.; Heltsley, B. K.; Hertz, D.; Jones, C. D.; Kandaswamy, J.; Kreinick, D. L.; Кузнецов, В. Е.; Mahlke-Krüger, H.; Onyisi, P. U. E.; Patterson, J. R.; Peterson, D.; Pivarski, J.; Riley, D.; Rýd, A.; Sadoff, A. J.; Schwarthoff, H.; Shi, X.; Stroiney, S.; Sun, W.; Wilksen, T.; Weinberger, M.; Athar, S. B.; Patel, R.; Potlia, V.; Yelton, J.; Rubin, P.; Cawlfield, C.; Eisenstein, B. I.; Karliner, I.; Kim, D.; Lowrey, N.; Naik, P.; Sedlack, C.; Selen, M.; White, E. J.; Wiss, J.; Shepherd, M. R.; Besson, D.; Pedlar, T. K.; Cronin-Hennessy, D.; Gao, K. Y.; Gong, D. T.; Hietala, J.; Kubota, Y.; Klein, T.; Lang, B. W.; Poling, R.; Scott, A. W.; Smith, A.; Zweber, P.; Dobbs, S.; Metreveli, Z.; Seth, K. K.; Tomaradze, A.; Ernst, J.; Severini, H.; Dytman, S. A.; Love, W. A.; Savinov, V.; Gutierrez, O. Aquines; Li, Z.; López, A.; Mehrabyan, S.; Méndez, H.; Vargas, J. E. Ramirez

doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.012002

Cited by 34 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(18) and (19) are of very different natures and completely independent of each other. Their product is equal to f +− = 0.516 ± 0.019, while another combination of them gives f +− + f 00 = 1.003 ± 0.029, compatible with unity.…”

Section: B-hadron Production Fractions In υ (4s) Decaysmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…0.0243 ± 0.0011 Derived from [6] B(B 0 s → D 0 X ) 0.08 ± 0.07 Model-dependent estimate [19,21] B(D 0 → K π) 0.0393 ± 0.0004 [6] B(B → φ X ) 0.0343 ± 0.0012 [6] B(B 0 s → φ X ) 0.161 ± 0.024 Model-dependent estimate [18] …”

Section: B(υ (5s) → D S X ) B(υ (5s) → φ X ) and B(υ (5s)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…= B(Υ (5S) → BB X) [17,18] We divide this by the bb production cross section, σ (e + e − → bbX) = 337 ± 15 pb, obtained as the average of the CLEO [21] and Belle [20] 4 measurements, to obtain . Following the method described in Ref.…”

Section: υ (5s) S Derived From Measurements Of F υ (5s) Udmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[26], we perform a χ 2 fit of the original measurements of the Υ (5S) branching fractions of Refs. [17][18][19], 4 using the inputs of Table 3, the relations of Eqs. (21) and (22) 4 Belle updated the analysis of Ref.…”

Section: υ (5s) S Derived From Measurements Of F υ (5s) Udmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(18) and (19) can be averaged (first converting Eq. (18) into a value of f 00 = 1/(R +−/00 + 1)) to yield the following more precise estimates: f 00 = 0.486 ± 0.006, f +− = 1 − f 00 = 0.514 ± 0.006,…”

Section: B-hadron Production Fractions In υ (4s) Decaysmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and $$\tau $$ τ -lepton properties as of summer 2016

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reports world averages of measurements of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ -lepton properties obtained by the Heavy Flavour Averaging Group using results available before April 2021. In rare cases, significant results obtained several months later are also used. For the averaging, common input parameters used in the various analyses are adjusted (rescaled) to common values, and known correlations are taken into account. The averages include branching fractions, lifetimes, neutral meson mixing parameters, CP violation parameters, parameters of semileptonic decays, and Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix elements. Selected world averages -continued from previous page. ∆Γ d /Γ d 0.001 ± 0.010 |q d /p d | 1.0010 ± 0.0008 ∆m s 17.765 ± 0.006 ps −1 ∆Γ s +0.084 ± 0.005 ps −1 |q s /p s | 1.0003 ± 0.0014 φ ccs s −0.049 ± 0.019 rad Unitarity-Triangle angle parameters sin2β ≡ sin2φ 1 0.699 ± 0.017 β ≡ φ 1 (22.2 ± 0.7) • −ηS φK 0 S 0.74 +0.11 −0.13 −ηS η K 0 0.63 ± 0.06 −ηS K 0 S K 0 S K 0 S 0.83 ± 0.17 φ s (φφ) −0.073 ± 0.115 ± 0.027 rad S B 0 s →K + K − , C B 0 s →K + K − (0.14 ± 0.03, 0.17 ± 0.03) −ηS J/ψ π 0 0.86 ± 0.14 −ηS D + D − 0.84 ± 0.12 −ηS J/ψ ρ 0 0.66 +0.13 −0.12 +0.09 −0.03(0.343 ± 0.002)% τ parameters, lepton universality, and |V us | g τ /g µ 1.0009 ± 0.0014 g τ /g e 1.0027 ± 0.0014 g µ /g e 1.0019 ± 0.0014* )0 s B ( * )0 s ) = (87.0 ± 1.7)% [34] measured as described in Ref. [35]. The proportions of the various production channels for non-strange B mesons have also been measured [22]. 4.3 b-hadron production fractions at high energy At high energy, all species of weakly decaying b hadrons may be produced, either directly or in strong and electromagnetic decays of excited b hadrons. Before 2010, it was assumed that the fractions of different species in unbiased samples of high-p T b-hadron jets where independent of whether they originated from Z decays, pp collisions at the Tevatron, or pp collisions at the LHC. This hypothesis was plausible under the condition Q 2 Λ 2 QCD , namely, that the square of the momentum transfer to the produced b quarks is large compared with the square of the hadronization energy scale. This hypothesis is correct in the limit p T → ∞, in which the production mechanism of a b hadron is completely described by the fragmentation of the b quark. For finite p T , however, there are interference effects of the production mechanism of the b quark and its hadronization. While formally suppressed by inverse powers of p T , these effects may be sizable, especially when the fragmentation probabilities are small as, e.g., in the case of b baryons. In fact, the available data show that the fractions depend on the kinematics of the produced b hadron. Both CDF and LHCb reported a p T dependence of the fractions, with the fraction of Λ 0 b baryons observed at low p T being enhanced with respect to that seen at LEP at higher p T . In our previous publication [1], we presented two sets of averages, one including only measurements performed at LEP, and another including only measurements performed ...

show abstract

Section: B-hadron Production Fractions In υ (4s) Decaysmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: B(υ (5s) → D S X ) B(υ (5s) → φ X ) and B(υ (5s)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: υ (5s) S Derived From Measurements Of F υ (5s) Udmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: υ (5s) S Derived From Measurements Of F υ (5s) Udmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: B-hadron Production Fractions In υ (4s) Decaysmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and $$\tau $$ τ -lepton properties as of summer 2016

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Probing reoxidation sites by in situ Raman spectroscopy: differences between reduced CeO₂ and Pt/CeO₂

Daniel¹,

Loridant

2012

J Raman Spectroscopy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Raman spectroscopy is a powerful technique for detecting peroxo (O2)2– and superoxo (O2)– species adsorbed on defect sites of ceria. These sites are probed by reducing CeO2 at high temperature and then chemisorbing oxygen species at low temperature. In the present study, it is shown for the first time that such Raman characterization has to be achieved at very low laser power to avoid formation of oxygen species by photolysis and analyze only the chemisorbed species. Respecting this requirement, the (O2)2– and (O2)– species formed on 0.7% Pt/CeO2 compound, and the CeO2 support used to prepare it were compared after reduction for various times and at various temperatures. Superoxo species were more stabilized on reduced 0.7% Pt/CeO2 after short reduction at 773 K than on reduced CeO2. Additionally, the distributions of peroxo species adsorbed on defect sites of Pt/CeO2 and CeO2 were significantly different after long reduction at 773 K in spite of similar amounts. Indeed, less stable species were formed during the reduction of 0.7% Pt/CeO2. These two features revealed that new sites were created during the preparation and reduction of Pt/CeO2 compared to its bare support. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

show abstract

Application of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for the determination of phenylurea herbicides in water samples by HPLC‐diode array detection

Saraji

Tansazan

2009

J of Separation Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A simple dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction method combined with HPLC-photodiode array detection has been developed for the determination of phenylurea herbicides in water samples. The herbicides studied included tebuthiuron, diuron, propanil, fluometuron, siduron, linuron, thidiazuron, and diflubenzuron. Several factors influencing the extraction efficiency of the studied compounds, such as extraction and disperser solvent type and their volumes, co-solvent type and its fraction, and ionic strength were investigated and optimized. Under the optimum extraction conditions, the calibration graphs were linear in the range of 0.2-200 mg/L for target analytes. The enrichment factors were between 11 and 118. The LOD were in the range of 0.01-0.5 mg/L (S/N 5 3). The relative standard deviations obtained ranged from 3.0 to 7.8% (n 5 5).

show abstract

Measurement ofB(Υ(5S)→Bs(*)
G. S. Huang¹,
D. H. Miller²,
V. Pavlunin³
et al.

Cited by 34 publications

References 18 publications

Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and $$\tau $$ τ -lepton properties as of summer 2016

Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and $$\tau $$ τ -lepton properties as of summer 2016

Probing reoxidation sites by in situ Raman spectroscopy: differences between reduced CeO₂ and Pt/CeO₂

Application of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for the determination of phenylurea herbicides in water samples by HPLC‐diode array detection

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Measurement ofB(Υ(5S)→Bs(*)G. S. Huang1, D. H. Miller2, V. Pavlunin3 et al.

Cited by 34 publications

References 18 publications

Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and $$\tau $$ τ -lepton properties as of summer 2016

Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and $$\tau $$ τ -lepton properties as of summer 2016

Probing reoxidation sites by in situ Raman spectroscopy: differences between reduced CeO2 and Pt/CeO2

Application of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for the determination of phenylurea herbicides in water samples by HPLC‐diode array detection

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Measurement ofB(Υ(5S)→Bs(*)
G. S. Huang¹,
D. H. Miller²,
V. Pavlunin³
et al.

Probing reoxidation sites by in situ Raman spectroscopy: differences between reduced CeO₂ and Pt/CeO₂