2020
DOI: 10.9734/jammr/2020/v32i1630624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Neck-Shaft Angle Using CT Scout View in Healthy Jordanian Adults - A Reliability and Agreement Study

Abstract: Aims: To report estimates of the reliability and agreement of a new method for measuring the femoral Neck-shaft angle in the Jordanian population. The neck-shaft angle is an important anatomical indicator in orthopedics of the hip. While there are different approaches to measuring the neck-shaft angle in the literature, there is no agreement on the best technique used for measurement. CT scout view was used in this study to provide a promising alternative. Study Design: Observational reliability and agre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A multi-national analysis of 8271 femora found that human neck-shaft angles varied from 120° to 140°, with a mean of 126.4° [7]. A recent study showed a mean value of 131.3° [8]. These values are subject to a wide range of discrepancies, as it was demonstrated that age varies inversely with the angle [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multi-national analysis of 8271 femora found that human neck-shaft angles varied from 120° to 140°, with a mean of 126.4° [7]. A recent study showed a mean value of 131.3° [8]. These values are subject to a wide range of discrepancies, as it was demonstrated that age varies inversely with the angle [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multi-national analysis of 8271 femora found that human neck-shaft angles varied from 120° to 140°, with a mean of 126.4° [ 10 ]. A recent study showed a mean value of 131.3° [ 11 ]. These values are subject to a wide range of discrepancies, as it was demonstrated that age varies inversely with the angle [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%