1986
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.146.1.75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of normal left heart dimensions using optimally oriented MR images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
1
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
13
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The wall thickness has decreased by about 17% for the dual-MF technique as compared with the standard ungated method currently used for perfusion imaging. These results are closer to average thickness as reported by MR imaging techniques (10.3 6 1.2 mm at end-diastole) (21). The myocardium-to-blood contrast increased more than 59% and CNR increased more than 89% for the dual-MF technique as compared with the reference ungated technique.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The wall thickness has decreased by about 17% for the dual-MF technique as compared with the standard ungated method currently used for perfusion imaging. These results are closer to average thickness as reported by MR imaging techniques (10.3 6 1.2 mm at end-diastole) (21). The myocardium-to-blood contrast increased more than 59% and CNR increased more than 89% for the dual-MF technique as compared with the reference ungated technique.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, it has been shown that the LV strated in studies that show the accuracy of this technique for measuring cardiac dimensions. [3][4][5][6][7] Preliminary studies have demonstrated the potential of NMR imaging for assessing LV volumes. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] These studies have used either imaging planes aligned with the axes of the body9J12"3 rather than the intrinsic axes of the heart, or spin-echo pulse sequences that require long acquisition times.…”
Section: Assessment Of Left Ventricular (Lv) Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1984, Longmore et al [16] reported that the measurement by angiocardiography was higher than that in MRI. In 1986, Kaul et al [17] reported that two-dimensional echocardiography had a strong correla- Note: The interaction effect was determined using a paried t test model. tion with MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%