1966
DOI: 10.1086/282436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of "Overlap" in Comparative Ecological Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
802
0
54

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,393 publications
(863 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
7
802
0
54
Order By: Relevance
“…DCA was carried out using the PC-ORD 4.0 program (MCCUNE & MEFFORD 1999). The logarithmized matrix was also used to calculate a similarity matrix among the samples (Q mode), using the Morisita-Horn Index (HORN 1966, KREBS 1999. Visualization of that matrix was obtained through an agglomerative cluster analysis (ROMESBURG 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DCA was carried out using the PC-ORD 4.0 program (MCCUNE & MEFFORD 1999). The logarithmized matrix was also used to calculate a similarity matrix among the samples (Q mode), using the Morisita-Horn Index (HORN 1966, KREBS 1999. Visualization of that matrix was obtained through an agglomerative cluster analysis (ROMESBURG 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values are arranged in similarity matrices that describe the position of each plot relative to all others in a multidimensional "hyperspace" whose axes are the relative abundances of all bird species or plant taxa censused, or all structural attributes measured. The similarity index used for the grassland flora and avifauna is R o Horn's (1966) index of overlap, which ranges from 0 (no shared species) to 1 (identical relative abundances). Because the structural variables cannot be represented by relative abundances, Ro is inappropriate to express plot relationships in this "space."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O grau de sobreposição alimentar foi calculado pela fórmula de Morisita modificada (HORN, 1966), utilizando os valores percentuais da freqüência de ocorrência de cada item do conteúdo estomacal e, à matriz de similaridade, foi aplicada a análise de agrupamento UPGMA (LEGENDRE & LEGENDRE, 1983).…”
Section: Methodsunclassified