2010
DOI: 10.1002/prep.200900026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Porosity in a Composite High Explosive as a Function of Pressing Conditions by Ultra‐Small‐Angle Neutron Scattering with Contrast Variation

Abstract: We have used ultra-small-angle neutron scattering (USANS) with contrast variation to measure the porosity (voids and binder-filled regions) in a composite high explosive, PBX 9501, formulated with a deuterated binder. Little is known about the microstructure of pressed PBX 9501 parts and thus how it is affected by processing.Here, we explore the effect of varying the pressing intensity on the PBX 9501 microstructure. Disk-shaped samples of PBX 9501 were die-pressed with applied pressures ranging between 10,000… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mm-scale pores mentioned in the preceding paragraph are larger than the ones that exist in a real composite explosive [16][17][18]. Direct experimental observation of pore collapse in real explosives is extremely difficult due to the high strain rates and small spatio-temporal scales over which pore collapse occurs, and because the phenomena of interest occur in the bulk of an optically impenetrable material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mm-scale pores mentioned in the preceding paragraph are larger than the ones that exist in a real composite explosive [16][17][18]. Direct experimental observation of pore collapse in real explosives is extremely difficult due to the high strain rates and small spatio-temporal scales over which pore collapse occurs, and because the phenomena of interest occur in the bulk of an optically impenetrable material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PBX 9501 is composed mainly of the HMX particles embedded within the matrix Estane/BDNPA-F, which can be seen including three kinds of “inclusions”; i.e., the coarse HMX particles, the fine HMX particles, and voids. The parameters in the PSD function for the PBX 9501 used in this study are given by experiment data [21,22], all of them were listed in Table 1, and the subscripts “1”, “2” and “3” represent “the coarse HMX particles,” “the fine HMX particles,” and “the voids,” respectively.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34]. The MOZ function was chosen because it returns comparable microstructural information to that of the model applied previously to high explosives [5], and unlike the previous model, the MOZ function is not restricted to isotropically scattering systems [25]. For porous systems, in the limit of an infinite fractal aggregate, the model provides a measure of the volume and surface dimensions and the primary void size: truenormalInormalQi=IoinormalQ-Df()1+Q2normalri2normalDnormals+normalDnormalf-62 truei=normalc,4ptnormaly4ptor4ptnormalz4ptand, trueI(normalQ)c=normalI()Qcosφ,4ptQsinφ,00<φ<2π trueI(normalQ)y=normalI()0,4ptQsinφ,Qcosφ-π12<φ+π2<π12 trueI(normalQ)​z=normalI()0,4ptQsinφ…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current USANS and SANS data were analyzed as a two-phase system using an empirical model that is a special case of the modified Ornstein-Zernike (MOZ) model utilized by Hurd et al [34]. The MOZ function was chosen because it returns comparable microstructural information to that of the model applied previously to high explosives [5], and unlike the previous model, the MOZ function is not restricted to isotropically scattering systems [25]. For porous systems, in the limit of an infinite fractal aggregate, the model provides a measure of the volume and surface dimensions and the primary void size: Here, the intensity components are the averages taken over the azimuthal angle, ϕ (Figure 2), over the indicated domain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation