2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2010.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of radon permeability through polyethylene membrane using scintillation detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surface/volume ratios and thickness of different PET bottles were examined to verify their role on radon loss rates over a period of 15 days. The main factor affecting radon loss rate of a given material is its surface/volume ratio, because either diffusion or adsorption, indicated as possible involved processes in the literature (Saito, 1983;Arafa, 2002;Fern andez et al, 2004;Ashry et al, 2011;De Simone et al, 2015), is surface dependent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface/volume ratios and thickness of different PET bottles were examined to verify their role on radon loss rates over a period of 15 days. The main factor affecting radon loss rate of a given material is its surface/volume ratio, because either diffusion or adsorption, indicated as possible involved processes in the literature (Saito, 1983;Arafa, 2002;Fern andez et al, 2004;Ashry et al, 2011;De Simone et al, 2015), is surface dependent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our initial analysis focused on the main methods used in other studies and on the norms ISO/TC 85/SC 2/WG 17 – Radioactivity measurements and ISO/CD 11665-10 Air: radion-222 – Part 10. For this study, the authors focused on the published results by Quindos Poncela, Fernandez, Gomez Arozamena and Sainz Fernandez 2004; Leung, Nikezic, Leung and Yu 2007; Mujahid, Hussain, Dogar and Karim 2005; Daoud and Renken 2001; Ashry, Abou-Leila and Abdalla 2011; Arafa 1994; Arafa 2002; Klein et al 1997; Jiránek and Hulka 2001; Jiránek and Hulka 2000; Keller, Hoffmann and Feigenspan 2001; Wójcik and Zuzel 2004; Narula, Chauhan and Chakarvarti 2010; Singh, Singh and Singh 2005. Our study was conceived taking into account the need for a tool that would allow the comparison between different products and that would simulate full-scale applications with as much reliability as possible.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The track density in each sheet was calculated to obtain D and D 0 for the open and closed plastic cups, respectively. The identical procedure was repeated using the CR-39 track detector that was etched at the optimum etching condition [49]. Figure 3a and b show a typical optical image of alpha particle tracks in the LR-115 and CR-39 detectors.…”
Section: Comparative Studies With the Track Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%