1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(99)00121-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of relative permittivity in sandy soils using TDR, capacitance and theta probes: comparison, including the effects of bulk soil electrical conductivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
77
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
77
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another plausible explanation for the nonuniform behavior could be the ThetaProbe's rod configuration that significantly concentrates the electromagnetic field around the central electrode, resulting in a small sampling volume (Table 3). This drawback was already raised by Robinson et al (1999) and Vaz et al (2013) who stated that this possibly renders the measurements more sensitive to compaction during the insertion of the instrument, as the effect is most distinct around the probe's center. Additionally, this problem becomes more important as moisture content increases.…”
Section: Comparison Of Fitted Versus the Literature Calibrations For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another plausible explanation for the nonuniform behavior could be the ThetaProbe's rod configuration that significantly concentrates the electromagnetic field around the central electrode, resulting in a small sampling volume (Table 3). This drawback was already raised by Robinson et al (1999) and Vaz et al (2013) who stated that this possibly renders the measurements more sensitive to compaction during the insertion of the instrument, as the effect is most distinct around the probe's center. Additionally, this problem becomes more important as moisture content increases.…”
Section: Comparison Of Fitted Versus the Literature Calibrations For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polar molecules such as water became polarised in the presence of the applied electric field owing to the absorbed energy by its molecules. The real (energy storage) and the imaginary (ionic conduction) parts (Robinson et al 1999) constitute the impedance which can be used in characterising the fluid-fluid-media system. Owing to sharp contrast between the relative permittivity of the porous medium and the surrounding fluids, a change in fluid content causes a change in the bulk relative permittivity, which is seen as a change in probe impedance affecting the shape of the reflected waveform.…”
Section: Bulk Relative Permittivity (ε B ) and Electric Conductivity mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That confirms the validity of the sensor on one hand and that of the experimental procedure applied on the other hand. Actually, the performance of the ThetaProbe sensors in field conditions was confirmed in various works (Lukangu et al, 1999;Robinson et al, 1999;Verhoef et al, 2006;Smethurst et al, 2006;Zhan et al, 2007). The results obtained in this study show that the compaction procedure used allowed the sensors to be installed with negligible effect on soil density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%