2014
DOI: 10.1167/14.10.821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of semantic knowledge of object categories: Creating the Semantic Vanderbilt Expertise Test (SVET)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the potential population of AMT workers is large, it is unknown how many with high levels of domain expertise might be workers on the platform. For expertise research, recruitment via AMT may need to be supplemented by more direct recruitment of true domain experts (e.g., Van Gulick, 2014 ).…”
Section: Recruitingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While the potential population of AMT workers is large, it is unknown how many with high levels of domain expertise might be workers on the platform. For expertise research, recruitment via AMT may need to be supplemented by more direct recruitment of true domain experts (e.g., Van Gulick, 2014 ).…”
Section: Recruitingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now well-recognized that self-reports of expertise are insufficient and that objective measures of expert performance are needed (e.g., Ericsson, 2006 , 2009 ); self-report measures of perceptual expertise are not always good predictors of performance (e.g., McGugin et al, 2012 ; Van Gulick, 2014 ). Therefore, recent work has used quantitative measures to assess expert abilities (e.g., see Gauthier et al, 2010 ).…”
Section: Evaluating Levels Of Perceptual Expertisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation