2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2008.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of semivolatile carbonaceous aerosols and its implications: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Replicate analyses were performed per 10 samples. The determined repeatability was better than 5% (Cheng et al, 2009;Tan et al, 2014).…”
Section: Oc/ecmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Replicate analyses were performed per 10 samples. The determined repeatability was better than 5% (Cheng et al, 2009;Tan et al, 2014).…”
Section: Oc/ecmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…2 and 3, respectively. The conversion factor of 1.6 was assumed to calculate OM from OC (Cheng et al, 2009). The concentrations of PM 2.5 were reconstructed from the ).…”
Section: Chemical Composition Of Pm 25mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results show that for EC emissions there is no significant change in filter loading when comparing the denuded filters with the undenuded filters, confirming that activated carbon denuders only adsorb organic volatile and semivolatile species but not elemental carbon. On a mass basis, the loss of particles in a denuder is small, since most of the lost particles have very small diameters (less than 30 nm), and the mass contribution of such particles is negligible compared with particles with greater diameters (Kittelson et al 2006;Cheng et al 2009). …”
Section: Pm Mass Ec and Oc Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But it is important to note that the same method has been applied to this study at the same lab. It should be also mentioned that OC results are not corrected with the backup quartz filter in this study, since the OC captured on it include both positive and negative artifacts and it is not possible to distinguish between them (Yang et al, 2005;Cheng et al, 2009). In order to have a better idea for the data comparability between this method and other two widely used thermal-optical methods (i.e., IMPROVE and NIOSH), a reference material -RM 8785 -produced by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (https://www-s.nist.gov/ srmors/view detail.cfm?srm=8785) was measured in the lab during 2006-2009 when the ambient samples were analyzed.…”
Section: Sample Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a Sunset instrument was used, no laser beam is applied in this method, instead long residence times at each temperature stage are optimized to ensure good baseline separation for individual carbon fractions. This is a modified NIOSH (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health) protocol (Chow et al, 2001). Three temperature stages used for separating OC, pyrolized organic carbon (POC) + carbonate carbon (CC) and EC, are 550 • C, 870 • C and 900 • C, respectively.…”
Section: Sample Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%