1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf01338925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of state and trait anxiety in elderly mental health clients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The instrument differentiates between and measures anxiety as a psychological state and as a personality trait. The reliability and validity of the STAI have been demonstrated as adequate by many researchers, including Spielberger et al (1970) and Patterson, O'Sullivan, and Spielberger (1980). On the STAI, Scores of 40 or above are generally considered clinically significant.…”
Section: State-trait Anxiety Inventorymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The instrument differentiates between and measures anxiety as a psychological state and as a personality trait. The reliability and validity of the STAI have been demonstrated as adequate by many researchers, including Spielberger et al (1970) and Patterson, O'Sullivan, and Spielberger (1980). On the STAI, Scores of 40 or above are generally considered clinically significant.…”
Section: State-trait Anxiety Inventorymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…40 Early psychometric studies conducted in adult and elderly people have provided support for the difference between trait and state anxiety, discriminant validity, and test-retest reliability of the Spielberger Inventory. 41,42 The Spielberger Inventory was mailed to the participants Ϸ3 weeks before the examination. The instrument was administered to subjects at baseline and at 2-year follow-up.…”
Section: Anxiety Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this revision, some authors considered STAI-Y as a measure of general negative affect including anxiety, depression or well-being (Bados, Gomez-Benito, & Balaguer, 2010;Balsamo et al, 2013;Bieling, Antony, & Swinson, 1998;Caci, Bayl e, Dossios, Robert, & Boyer, 2003). Nevertheless, many studies showed the utility of this measure in older populations (e.g., Dennis, Boddington, & Funnell, 2007;Patterson, O'Sullivan, & Spielberger, 1980;Stanley, Beck, & Zebb, 1996;Stanley, Novy, Bourland, Beck, & Averill, 2001). This scale is also relevant because it is less oriented toward somatic symptoms of anxiety than other widely used scales, such as the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (Keedwell & Snaith, 1996;Morin et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%