2007
DOI: 10.1521/aeap.2007.19.3.198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Stigma in People with HIV: A Reexamination of the HIV Stigma Scale

Abstract: Stigma associated with HIV infection can unfavorably impact the lives and behavior of people living with HIV/AIDS. The HIV Stigma Scale was designed to measure the perception of stigma by those who are HIV infected. Reanalysis of the psychometric properties of this scale was conducted in a new sample of 157 individuals living with HIV/AIDS in rural New England. This resulted in revision of the scale: shortening it from 40 to 32 items and retaining the original four factors but renaming one: Enacted Stigma (for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
188
1
9

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
14
188
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…We assessed internalized HIV stigma using the negative self-image subscale of the HIV Stigma Scale [36,37]; higher scores indicated higher levels of stigma (Cronbach's alpha 0.875). Selfreported antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence in the previous 7 days was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS).…”
Section: Hiv-specific Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assessed internalized HIV stigma using the negative self-image subscale of the HIV Stigma Scale [36,37]; higher scores indicated higher levels of stigma (Cronbach's alpha 0.875). Selfreported antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence in the previous 7 days was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS).…”
Section: Hiv-specific Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the direct negative effects on mental and emotional health of people suffering from HIV/AIDS (Link, Struening, Rahav, Phelan & Nuttbrock 1997;Logie & Gadalla 2009;Minior, Galea, Stuber, Ahern & Ompad 2003;Young, Stuber, Ahern & Galea 2005), key obstacles to use HIV services, including delays in receiving care from health centers (Alonzo & Reynolds 1995;Chesney & Smith 1999;Fortenberry et al 2002;Holzemer et al 2007), increasing feelings of hopelessness and despair (Buseh & Stevens 2006), increase rates of depression (Berger, Ferrans & Lashley 2001;Vanable, Carey, Blair & Littlewood 2006;Wright, Naar-King, Lam, Templin & Frey 2007), low selfesteem (Berger et al 2001;Bunn, Solomon, Miller & Forehand 2007;Vanable et al 2006;Wright et al 2007), disorders in mental health (Mak, Poon, Pun & Cheung 2007), participation in risky sexual behaviors (Kinsler, Wong, Sayles, Davis & Cunningham 2007;Sayles et al 2008;Vanable et al 2006), and a negative impact on the illness behavior of people suffering from HIV, for example; no interest to look for centers to do HIV testing and no adherence to the medical regimen (Butt 2008;Fortenberry et al 2002;Pascoe & Smart Richman 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instrument (and various short forms) has been found to have good internal consistency reliability in African Americans (Rao et al, 2007;Wright et al, 2007) and a rural population of predominantly white men living in New England (Bunn et al, 2007). However, the development of the instrument did not include direct input from HIV-positive women and men, such as interviews or focus groups to inform item content or formal cognitive interviewing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%