1977
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.15.1636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the 2200 m/sec neutron-proton capture cross section

Abstract: The neutron-proton capture cross section at the neutron laboratory velocity of 2200 m/sec has been determined from the time decay of the thermalized neutron population following short bursts of fast neutrons in water samples of widely varying sizes. Use of an intense pulsed neutron beam enables elimination of many of the problems encountered in earlier experiments. The present result for this cross section is 332.6 + 0.7 mb, which is the most precise of any result obtained by this method and is comparable in a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
22
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
8
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 shows the time difference between selected neutron candidates and their primary interaction. Fitting this distribution yields a neutron capture time of 205.2 ± 3.7μs, in good agreement with existing measurements [3]. Application of this tagging to the atmospheric neutrino data set is expected to help distinguish CC antineutrino interactions, which are accompanied by a neutron at the primary vertex, from neutrino interactions and to help reduce backgrounds to proton decay searches.…”
Section: Detector and Data Setsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Figure 2 shows the time difference between selected neutron candidates and their primary interaction. Fitting this distribution yields a neutron capture time of 205.2 ± 3.7μs, in good agreement with existing measurements [3]. Application of this tagging to the atmospheric neutrino data set is expected to help distinguish CC antineutrino interactions, which are accompanied by a neutron at the primary vertex, from neutrino interactions and to help reduce backgrounds to proton decay searches.…”
Section: Detector and Data Setsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The combined neutron capture time in water was measured to be (202.6±3.7) µs, which was in good agreement with the (204.7±0.4) µs in Ref. [28]. Combining the neutron tagging efficiencies of the three source positions gave a weighted average of (10.6 ± 0.2)%, which was compared to the neutron tagging efficiency ǫ n in Section V A 2.The maximum percent difference between the optimal signal efficiency found in Section V A 2 (9.6%) and the neutron tagging efficiency determined using the Am/Be source was calculated to be 10.4%.…”
Section: Neutron Tagging Uniformity and Validationsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…It also uses a new treatment of photon channels in R-matrix theory that is more consistent with identifying the vector potential with a photon "wavefunction". In the last stages of the analysis, the thermal capture cross section was forced to a value of 332.0 mb (as in ENDF/B-VI.8), rather than the "best" experimental value of 332.6 ±0.7 mb [179], since criticality data testing of aqueous thermal systems showed a slight preference for the lower value. Also, the latest measurement [180] of the coherent n − p scattering length was used, resulting in close agreement with that value, and with an earlier measurement of the thermal scattering cross section [181], but not with a later, more precise value [182].…”
Section: F Light Element Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%