1981
DOI: 10.1121/1.386953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the acoustic input immittance of the human ear

Abstract: A method is presented for measuring acoustic immittance (admittance or impedance) in the human ear canal and its validity is demonstrated for frequencies from 62 Hz to 4 kHz. Special attention is given to estimating the residual ear-canal space between the eardrum and the tip of the measuring device; estimates were determined, in part, using immittances measured with static pressures applied in the ear canal. Immittance estimates at the eardrum are reported for four normal subjects. Below 500 Hz, the immittanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
65
3
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
14
65
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency response of the normalized input admittance of the middle ear is bandpass, similar to that reported by Rabinowitz (1981) up to 4 kHz, with the middle ear becoming mass-controlled above 4 kHz. The frequency response differs from the more narrowly tuned response reported by O'Connor and Puria (2008), suggesting that postmortem changes may simplify the tuning properties of the middle ear although Voss et al (2000) reported an input impedance magnitude and phase from temporal bones more consistent with Figure 4.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The frequency response of the normalized input admittance of the middle ear is bandpass, similar to that reported by Rabinowitz (1981) up to 4 kHz, with the middle ear becoming mass-controlled above 4 kHz. The frequency response differs from the more narrowly tuned response reported by O'Connor and Puria (2008), suggesting that postmortem changes may simplify the tuning properties of the middle ear although Voss et al (2000) reported an input impedance magnitude and phase from temporal bones more consistent with Figure 4.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Previous studies of the acoustic input impedance of the ear include lumped element models of the human middle ear (e.g., Kringlebotn 1988;Moller 1961;Zwislocki 1962), experimental studies of the middle ear of human temporal bones (e.g., O'Connor and Puria 2008;Voss et al 2000), experimental studies of human ears (e.g., Farmer-Fedor and Rabbitt 2002;Kringlebotn 1994;Margolis et al 1999;Moller 1965;Rabinowitz 1981;Voss and Allen 1994), and models and experimental studies of animal ears (e.g., Huang et al 2000;Lynch et al 1994;Parent and Allen 2007). Prior to 1981, experimental studies of the acoustic input impedance of the ear in humans were limited to about 1.5 kHz, the ear canal treated as an acoustic compliance (Rabinowitz 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This difference in hole size accounts for the difference in the frequency of the air-space and hole anti-resonance. (Zwislocki 1962& Rabinowitz 1981 and in the ears of two patients with missing inci (Zwislocki 1962). (C) and (D) Comparisons of admittance measured in individual rabbit and cat ears made with the middle-ear air spaces widely opened, before and after interrupting the ossicular chain (Møller 1965).…”
Section: Isjmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Knowledge of these source parameters permitted us to calculate the acoustic admittance at the measurement site within the ear canal coupler Y EC . The admittance at the tympanic membrane Y TM was calculated from the ear-canal admittance using a transmission-line correction based on the dimensions of the ear coupler and post-experiment fluid-filling measurements of the residual ear-canal volume between the coupler and the TM (Møller 1965;Rabinowitz 1981;Lynch et al 1994). The units of acoustic admittance are siemens (S), where 1 S equals 1 Pa-s-m −3 .…”
Section: Sound Stimulation and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%