1997
DOI: 10.1007/s002640050124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the anteroposterior translation of the humeral head using MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence of coupled motions at the glenohumeral joint, 5,6,15,20,30,34,43,44 combined with reports of alterations in passive range of motion as a function of extremity dominance or sports participation or both, 2,7,19,23,29 led to the hypothesis that specific passive range of motion values would be strongly correlated with specific directions of glenohumeral joint laxity. This, however, was not the case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence of coupled motions at the glenohumeral joint, 5,6,15,20,30,34,43,44 combined with reports of alterations in passive range of motion as a function of extremity dominance or sports participation or both, 2,7,19,23,29 led to the hypothesis that specific passive range of motion values would be strongly correlated with specific directions of glenohumeral joint laxity. This, however, was not the case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One measured <1 mm translation with the arm along the side and overhead (elevation and internal rotation) and found no difference between stable and unstable shoulders. 28 The other study found an anterior translation of 2.6 ± 1.1 mm as the arm was elevated from 30° to 90° and in neutral rotation and 3.0 ± 1.1 mm from 30° to 90° elevation and external rotation. A 10 N weight inducing external rotation applied to the abducted shoulder led to a posterior translation of 1.1 ± 0.5 mm in unstable shoulders, thus recentering the humeral head.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“… Lippitt (1994) 34 case-control ☆☆☆ ☆☆ 5/9 stars Reportedly accurate within 1 mm in cadavers. MRI Kiss (1997) 28 case-control ☆☆ ☆☆ 4/9 stars Reproducibility from 2 measurements (2 SD): 0.76 mm for internal rotation, 0.28 mm for external rotation, 1.52 mm for overhead position. von Eisenhart-Rothe (2002) 9 case-control ☆☆☆ ☆☆ † ☆☆☆ 8/9 stars N/A CT Kim (2017) 27 case-control ☆☆☆ ☆☆ † ☆☆ 7/9 stars Estimated root-mean-square errors (RMSE): 0.43 mm for the in-plane direction, 1.53 mm for the out-of-plane direction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation