1996
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(96)00926-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the b forward-backward asymmetry and mixing using high-p⊥ leptons

Abstract: The B0 - B0 average mixing parameter χ and b forward-backward asymmetry A0FB (b) are measured from a sample of about 4 200 000 Z -> qq events recorded with the ALEPH detector at LEP in the years 1990-1995. High transverse momentum electrons and muons produced in b semileptonic decays provide the tag of the quark flavour and of its charge. The average mixing parameter and the pole b asymmetry are measured to be χ = 0.1246 +/- 0.0051stat +/- 0.0052syst, A0FB (b) = 0.1008 +/- 0.0043stat +/- 0.0028syst. The value … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This underestimate of the background in the Monte Carlo, by a factor of three, remains when both tracks are further required to cross the ight path of the B hadron candidate downstream of the interaction point. The origin of this discrepancy is not fully understood, but a large fraction of it can be attributed to a previously observed excess of tracks with high transverse momentum relative to their jet axes observed in the data with respect to Monte Carlo predictions [13]. In the present analysis when only the kinematic cuts are applied the Monte Carlo underestimates the data by a factor of 1.6, which explains only a part of the eect.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 37%
“…This underestimate of the background in the Monte Carlo, by a factor of three, remains when both tracks are further required to cross the ight path of the B hadron candidate downstream of the interaction point. The origin of this discrepancy is not fully understood, but a large fraction of it can be attributed to a previously observed excess of tracks with high transverse momentum relative to their jet axes observed in the data with respect to Monte Carlo predictions [13]. In the present analysis when only the kinematic cuts are applied the Monte Carlo underestimates the data by a factor of 1.6, which explains only a part of the eect.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 37%
“…3, are determined by the method reported in Ref. [8], but with the uds component of the background inated to take i n to account the discrepancies observed between data and Monte Carlo [17]. The uncertainties inherent to this procedure are included in the systematic error ( 25%) on the total background fraction, which is assumed comparable to the overall correction (+22%).…”
Section: Event Selection and Sample Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%